Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E044453
|
Aaron D., a Minor
California court with limited emergency jurisdiction over children must contact Texas court as soon as possible after learning of pending custody proceedings. |
Family Law |
|
Aug. 19, 2008 | |
G037959
|
Marriage of Mosley
Reduction of base salary constitutes change in circumstance warranting modification of support obligations. |
Family Law |
|
Aug. 17, 2008 | |
B206462
|
Justin L. v. Superior Court (Los Angeles County Dept. of Children and Family Services)
Writ review is granted solely for purpose of ensuring compliance with ICWA inquiry and notice requirements. |
Family Law |
|
Aug. 14, 2008 | |
D052204
|
Yvonne W., a Minor
Parental custody is improperly denied where residence in housing shelter does not constitute 'substantial risk of detriment.' |
Family Law |
|
Aug. 14, 2008 | |
D051521
|
Esperanza C., a Minor
Juvenile court may review Health and Human Services Agency's denial of criminal records exemption for abuse of discretion. |
Family Law |
|
Aug. 11, 2008 | |
B192878
|
Jonathan L. v. Superior Court (Los Angeles County Dept. of Children and Family Services)
Statutory permission to home school may constitutionally be overridden in order to ensure safety of dependent child. |
Family Law |
|
Aug. 11, 2008 | |
E043180
|
Marriage of Ramirez
Wife is entitled to judgment of annulment where husband intended to be unfaithful at time of marriage. |
Family Law |
|
Aug. 4, 2008 | |
G038644
|
Marriage of Bardzik
Parent seeking to modify child support order bears burden of proving other parent's ability and opportunity to earn imputed income. |
Family Law |
|
Jul. 30, 2008 | |
G039713
|
A.M., a Minor
Father's request for self-representation is properly denied where court could anticipate significant delay in juvenile dependency proceeding. |
Family Law |
|
Jul. 30, 2008 | |
E045044
|
Esmeralda S., a Minor
Appointment of guardian ad litem is harmless where mother's rights would have been terminated regardless of due process violation. |
Family Law |
|
Jul. 24, 2008 | |
G039898
|
P.C., a Minor
Child custody case is remanded to determine whether legally sufficient grounds independent of poverty exist to terminate parental rights. |
Family Law |
|
Jul. 24, 2008 | |
C057638
|
Brandon T., A Minor
Termination of parental rights is affirmed where child is specifically adoptable by his relative caretakers. |
Family Law |
|
Jul. 21, 2008 | |
H030110
|
Marriage of Sonne
Court abuses discretion in assigning wife entire survivor benefit in exchange for reimbursing husband for reduction in his retirement allowance payments. |
Family Law |
|
Jul. 18, 2008 | |
G039141
|
Allison C., A Minor
Substantial evidence supports order declaring minor free from father's parental custody and control. |
Family Law |
|
Jul. 15, 2008 | |
G039713
|
A.M., a Minor
Father's request for self-representation is properly denied where court could anticipate significant delay in juvenile dependency proceeding. |
Family Law |
|
Jul. 11, 2008 | |
D052401
|
A.B., a Minor
Failure to provide ICWA notice does not prejudice father where agency supplements record with document in which mother denies having Indian heritage. |
Family Law |
|
Jul. 10, 2008 | |
D052202
|
S.B., a Minor
Court errs in refusing to apply exception to termination of parental rights to father who has continuing beneficial relationship with dependent daughter. |
Family Law |
|
Jun. 30, 2008 | |
B201604
|
Jorge G., a Minor
Juvenile court has temporary emergency jurisdiction over abandoned child but must vacate dispositional orders to allow proper service of parents in Mexico. |
Family Law |
|
Jun. 23, 2008 | |
G039351
|
William B., a Minor
Juvenile court errs in giving mother with history of substance abuse 'one more chance' at reunification services after three failed attempts. |
Family Law |
|
Jun. 13, 2008 | |
B200176
|
Darlene T., a Minor
Relative caregiver of children is required to exhaust her administrative remedies before court can consider funding issue. |
Family Law |
|
Jun. 9, 2008 | |
E044391
|
R.D., a Minor
San Bernardino County Juvenile Court should have accepted transfer of dependency case because child and his legal guardian resided in San Bernardino. |
Family Law |
|
Jun. 4, 2008 | |
C054387
|
San Joaquin County Dept. of Child Support Services v. Winn
Commissioner's proposed statement of decision concluding county may order genetic testing is not final judgment from which alleged father may appeal. |
Family Law |
|
May 29, 2008 | |
A114589
|
Marriage of Gong
Where it appears to reviewing court that appeal was frivolous, it may add to costs such damages as may be just. |
Family Law |
|
May 29, 2008 | |
C053515
|
Marriage of Carlsson
In divorce case, judge's abrupt ending of trial before completion of husband's case constitutes reversible error. |
Family Law |
|
May 27, 2008 | |
B206049
|
Rayna N., a Minor
Where juvenile court fails to comply with notice requirements applicable in Indian child custody proceedings, limited reversal is not prohibited. |
Family Law |
|
May 27, 2008 | |
B204618
|
Los Angeles County Dept. of Children and Family Services v. Superior Court (Stacy P.)
Court finds that Welfare and Institutions Code does not allow dismissal of dependency petitions at detention hearings by juvenile court. |
Family Law |
|
May 19, 2008 | |
B203089
|
Marriage of Holtemann
In divorce case, written agreement depicts husband's clear expression of transmutation of separate property to community property. |
Family Law |
|
May 13, 2008 | |
G038437
|
In re Ellis
Intent of Domestic Partner Act is to apply equitable putative spouse doctrine to persons with reasonable, good faith belief in validity of domestic partnerships. |
Family Law |
|
May 7, 2008 | |
B202299
|
Lesly G., a Minor
Juvenile court errs in terminating parental rights after denying--and failing to hold required hearing on--mother's petition for modification. |
Family Law |
|
May 2, 2008 | |
C057419
|
State Dept. of Social Services v. Superior Court (D.P.)
Juvenile court has discretion to decide that emergency removal of children was justified after considering circumstances that resulted after removal. |
Family Law |
|
Apr. 25, 2008 |