| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B328026  | Nabors Corporate Services, Inc. v. City of Long Beach Arbitration awards against City of Long Beach for failing to identify project as "public work," fell within Labor Code Section 1781's scope allowing for subcontractor to seek indemnity against City. | Government, Employment Law |  | D. Kim | Feb. 4, 2025 | 
| B333507 | Election Integrity Project California, Inc. v. Lunn Under Election Code Section 15104(d), an observer's "sufficiently close" access to view election procedures did not mean "breathing down the necks of the election workers." | Government |  | A. Gilbert | Feb. 3, 2025 | 
| 21-36024 | Nwauzor v. The GEO Group, Inc. The application of Washington's Minimum Wage Act to civil detainees held in GEO's privately operated federal detention center did not violate the doctrine of intergovernmental immunity. | Government, Immunity |  | W. Fletcher | Jan. 17, 2025 | 
| B316745 | Alliance Marce & Eva Stern Math & Science High School v. Public Employment Relations Board Gov. Code Section 3350, which prohibits public employers from discouraging union membership, is not facially unconstitutional because it regulates only government speech unprotected by the First Amendment. | Government, Education |  | V. Chavez | Dec. 30, 2024 | 
| G063082  | Kabat v. Department of Transportation Summary judgment for dangerous condition of public property liability under Government Code Section 835 was proper when Caltrans provided evidence that it had no notice of allegedly dangerous condition. | Government, Torts |  | T. Delaney | Dec. 23, 2024 | 
| 12-56867 | Fazaga v. Federal Bureau of Investigation State secrets privilege does not mandate dismissal of action unless it deprives the United States of information establishing a valid defense or makes litigation impossible due to risks of disclosure. | Government |  | M. Berzon | Dec. 23, 2024 | 
| A168517  | California Resources Production Corp. v. Antioch City Council Trial court properly dismissed suit alleging equal protection violations against city after it declined to extend plaintiff's agreement to operate gas pipeline. | Government, Constitutional Law |  | J. Goldman | Dec. 20, 2024 | 
| B331881 | Assn. for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs v. County of Los Angeles Despite new legislation's mandates disallowing law enforcement gang participation, targeted interviews of certain officers triggered Meyers-Milias Brown Act meet-and-confer requirements. | Government, Municipal Law |  | A. Davis | Nov. 22, 2024 | 
| D083420 | McCurdy v. County of Riverside After a successful habeas petition, petitioner's claim against County was subject to 6-month presentation window for tort claims. | Government, Torts |  | J. Kelety | Nov. 22, 2024 | 
| D081911 | Burton v. Campbell Failure to make demand to cure and correct as required by statute meant interested person could not bring suit seeking determination that city council legislative action was null and void. | Government |  | J. Irion | Nov. 21, 2024 | 
| D082749 | Petree v. Public Employees' Retirement System After City contracted with County for policing services, former officers were not entitled to County pension increase for years as City officers. | Government |  | W. Dato | Nov. 8, 2024 | 
| B331062 | Bedard v. City of Los Angeles Trial court's affirmance of city employee's termination due to refusal to be vaccinated was supported by substantial evidence. | Employment Law, Government |  | L. Edmon | Nov. 4, 2024 | 
| A167908 | Bath v. State of California State employees' contract claim against the State survived demurrer because right to receive compensation for completed work ripened into Constitutionally-protected contractual rights. | Government, Employment Law |  | M. Miller | Oct. 25, 2024 | 
| D082997 | Ramirez v. City of Indio City Manager was not bound by an arbitrator's findings with respect to the evidence supporting termination of a police officer under the City of Indio's Memorandum of Understanding. | Government, Employment Law |  | J. Kelety | Oct. 14, 2024 | 
| 22-15862 | Stein v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. The False Claim Act's first-to-file rule is not jurisdictional. | Government, Civil Procedure |  | D. Forrest | Sep. 25, 2024 | 
| E078961 | Riversiders Against Increased Taxes v. City of Riverside The State's definition of "special election" preempted the City of Riverside's charter for the purposes of adopting a new taxation measure. | Government |  | M. Ramirez | Aug. 21, 2024 | 
| C101764 | Bonta v. Superior Court (Coupal) Attorney General must be granted discretion when drafting measure's ballot information--in this case, to omit in the ballot label, language that was already part of the title and summary. | Government |  | R. Robie | Aug. 15, 2024 | 
| 23-55205 | Pomares v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs Department of Veterans Affairs's method of manually searching for emails in response to Freedom of Information Act request was reasonable. | Government |  | D. Forrest | Aug. 14, 2024 | 
| A169314 | West Contra Costa Unified School Dist. v. Superior Court (A.M.M.) Waiving the Government Code's timely claim presentation requirement for childhood sexual assault claims did not violate the California Constitution's Gifts Clause. | Government, Constitutional Law |  | M. Simons | Aug. 2, 2024 | 
| B331080 | Modification:  Morell v. Board of Retirement of the Orange County Employees' Retirement System Retirement system's definition of compensation which was later repealed by the legislature was still valid due to the repeal's savings clause. | Government |  | Jul. 30, 2024 | |
| B331080 | Morell v. Board of Retirement of the Orange County Employees' Retirement System Retirement system's definition of compensation which was later repealed by the legislature was still valid due to the repeal's savings clause. | Government |  | V. Chaney | Jul. 12, 2024 | 
| A166787 | Danielson v. County of Humboldt Plaintiff-appellant's government tort claim for injuries cause by dog attack failed because the County had no mandatory statutory duty that it failed to discharge. | Government |  | P. Siggins | Jun. 28, 2024 | 
| B326977 | Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Assn. v. County of Los Angeles The fiduciary board of a county public employee retirement system has authority to create employment classifications and set salaries for employees of the retirement system. | Government |  | J. Segal | Jun. 25, 2024 | 
| S281977 | Legislature of the State of California v. Weber (Hiltachk) Ballot measure that would require voter approval for any tax increases was an unconstitutional revision to the Constitution. | Government |  | G. Liu | Jun. 21, 2024 | 
| G062646 | Talley Amusements, Inc. v. The 32nd District Agricultural Association Remedies for violations of competitive bidding process for public contracts did not apply to carnival contract because it was not a contract for services to be rendered to the state. | Government |  | T. Goethals | Jun. 20, 2024 | 
| D083075 | Helm v. City of Los Angeles Because pedestrian's slip-and-fall occurred in area that was integral to the location and design of a recreational trail's pathway, trail immunity shielded the city. | Government |  | J. Kelety | May 15, 2024 | 
| H050889 | City of San Jose v. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association Because pension benefits were an established debt that did not trigger the constitutional debt limitation, city was not required to seek voter approval for bonds financing the benefits. | Government |  | A. Danner | May 1, 2024 | 
| H050881 | City of Santa Cruz v. Superior Court (County of Santa Cruz) Pursuant to Government Code Sections 935, 905, and a local ordinance, County was required to present its claims to City before filing lawsuit. | Government |  | P. Bamattre-Manoukian | Apr. 17, 2024 | 
| C100304 | Weber v. Superior Court (Fong) Elections Code section 8003 did not prohibit candidate from filing nomination papers for two different offices in California primary. | Government |  | L. Earl | Apr. 10, 2024 | 
| B330847 | State of California v. Superior Court (Energy and Policy Institute) Writ mandating calendar information for Governor's advisor's meetings with utility organizations was properly granted when requested details were incidental to the deliberative process but potentially of great public interest. | Government |  | H. Bendix | Apr. 9, 2024 | 
 

 
