For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
G.L. Mezzetta Inc. v. City of American Canyon
Under state and local statutes, city may not enter into and be bound by oral contracts. 		Government Apr. 28, 2000
In the Matter of the Title , Ballot Title and Submission Clause
Initiative, defining marriage as between man and woman, meets setting titles and summary requirements. 		Government Apr. 18, 2000
Springer v. State of Alabama
Order 		Government Apr. 5, 2000
Lorig v. Medical Board of California
Address of record filed with licensing agency is public information. 		Government Mar. 31, 2000
State of Alaska v. United States
In dispute between federal government and Alaska, title to riverbeds lie with state if river is navigable at statehood. 		Government Mar. 30, 2000
Sun v. Taiwan
Foreign state engaging in commercial activity isn't immune from liability if commercial activity directly relates to claimant's injury. 		Government Mar. 30, 2000
McNatt v. Apfel
Administrative law judge should offer to postpone social security benefits hearing when attorney isn't ready to proceed because of applicant's absence. 		Government Mar. 30, 2000
City and County of San Francisco v. Sainez
Fines imposed for housing code infractions do not violate due process and excessive-fines protections of state and federal constitutions. 		Government Mar. 30, 2000
A-1 Ambulance Service Inc. v. State of California
Public disclosure bar of False Claims Act applies to information disclosed in local administrative hearings on public bidding for government contract. 		Government Mar. 29, 2000
McNally v. Arapahoe County District Attorney Office
Order 		Government Mar. 22, 2000
Independent Acceptance Co v. State of California
Federal government may rely on state's assurance that public was given adequate notice of proposed changes in Medicaid reimbursement method. 		Government Mar. 21, 2000
Common Sense Alliance v. Davidson
Organization that is originally formed for another purpose cannot evolve into issue committee subject to reporting requirements of Fair Campaign Practices Act. 		Government Mar. 15, 2000
MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. U.S. West Communications
Interconnection agreement may provide that incumbent local exchange carrier must refrain from separating already combined network elements before providing them to competitor. 		Government Mar. 14, 2000
Calprop Corp. v. City of San Diego
City's delay to resolve dispute with property owners over development of land does not give rise to inverse condemnation claim. 		Government Mar. 3, 2000
Riverside County Community Facilities District No. 87-1 v. Bainbridge 17
County's charges levied on homeowners' properties are 'special tax' under Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act, not special assessment. 		Government Mar. 3, 2000
Flynt v. Apfel
Order 		Government Mar. 3, 2000
Fraternal Order of Police v. City of Commerce City
State constitution allows city counsel to add and remove members from arbitration panel that resolves disputes between police officers and city. 		Government Mar. 2, 2000
Dept. of the Army v. Blue Fox Inc.
Equitable liens are forms of 'money damages' for which the government has sovereign immunity from liability. 		Government Feb. 28, 2000
Gammon v. Douglas County
Order 		Government Feb. 27, 2000
Bates v. Jones
California's lifetime legislative term limits are unconstitutional. 		Government Feb. 8, 2000
Burgert v. The Lokelani Bernice Pauahi Bishop Trust
Native Hawaiian Education Act and Native Hawaiian Health Care Act do not create implied private rights of action. 		Government Feb. 8, 2000
Lopez v. United States
Innocent store owners can be permanently disqualified from food stamp program. 		Government Feb. 7, 2000
Dameron Physicians Medical Group Inc. v. Shalala
State can cap reimbursement to health care providers below the level permitted by Medicare. 		Government Feb. 7, 2000
Communications Telesystems International v. California Public Utility Commission
Telecommunications Act of 1996 doesn't pre-empt state's authority to impose sanctions against service provider that switched customers' services without their consent. 		Government Feb. 4, 2000
San Diego Chapter of the Surfrider Foundation v. Dalton
Opinion 		Government Feb. 4, 2000
Lindsey v. Tacoma-Pierce County Health Dept.
Local ban on outdoor tobacco advertising is pre-empted by Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act. 		Government Feb. 4, 2000
Evens v. Superior Court (Los Angeles Unified School District)
Statutes and privacy laws don't prohibit schools from using unconsented video recordings of teacher in classroom for disciplinary actions. 		Government Feb. 3, 2000
Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC
Missouri statute limiting campaign contributions to candidates for state office does not violate First Amendment. 		Government Feb. 2, 2000
United Airlines Inc. v. City and County of Denver
Denver use tax, which doesn't credit sales and use taxes paid in other states, violates Commerce Clause. 		Government Jan. 25, 2000
In the Matter of the Title, Ballot Title and Submission Clause, and Summary for 1999-2000 No. 200A
Initiative doesn't violate single-subject requirement when its provisions all directly tie to focus of ensuring woman's voluntary and informed consent for an abortion. 		Government Jan. 25, 2000
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.