For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
Jackson v. Superior Court (People)
Superior court has power to reconsider and vacate order granting habeas relief on motion to reconsider filed within 60-day time period for appeal. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 3, 2010
Davis v. United States
Order 		Nov. 2, 2010
Turner v. Price
Order 		Nov. 2, 2010
Fox v. Vice
Order 		Nov. 2, 2010
Matthews v. McDaniels
Order 		Nov. 2, 2010
Stoller v. Court of Appeals of AZ, et al.
Order 		Nov. 2, 2010
Albright-Lazzari v. Hamilton
Order 		Nov. 2, 2010
Cohen v. Terrell
Order 		Nov. 2, 2010
Farris v. Oklahoma
Order 		Nov. 2, 2010
Berryhill v. Seay, Judge, USDC ED OK, et al.
Order 		Nov. 2, 2010
Grandoit v. Physician Network, Inc., et al.
Order 		Nov. 2, 2010
Berryhill v. White, Judge, USDC ED OK, et al.
Order 		Nov. 2, 2010
Berryhill v. Payne, Judge, USDC ND OK, et al.
Order 		Nov. 2, 2010
In re Lonnie L. Griffin
Order 		Nov. 2, 2010
Bd. of Trustees of Leland v. Roche Molecular Systems, et al.
Order 		Nov. 2, 2010
J. D. B. v. North Carolina
Order 		Nov. 2, 2010
Crittenden v. Ayers
Defendant is not required to prove peremptory strike would have been issued if race had played no role when challenging juror’s dismissal. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 2, 2010
U.S. v. George
Failure to register as sex offender does not violate ex post facto clause because federal statute was enacted before date of conviction. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 2, 2010
Arredondo v. Holder
BIA fails to engage in substantive analysis of decision to dismiss appeal and decline to affirm denial of application for cancellation of removal. 		Immigration Nov. 2, 2010
Mepco Services Inc. v. Saddleback Valley Unified School District
Trial court properly awards attorney fees to prevailing party pursuant to performance bond, which provided for attorney fees. 		Contracts Nov. 2, 2010
In re McDonald
Governor may not condition petitioner’s parole on admission of guilt, absent any additional indication of current dangerousness. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 2, 2010
People v. Baldwin
Trial court errs by excluding hearsay evidence of defendant's inconsistent statements on ground that defendant was required to testify. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 2, 2010
Wong v. Smith
Order 		Nov. 1, 2010
Affan v. Portofino Cove Homeowners Association
Judicial deference to homeowners association is not proper where association's failure to take action was not good faith decision based on reasonable investigation. 		Real Property Nov. 1, 2010
Brandon v. United States
Order 		Nov. 1, 2010
State of Montana v. BNSF Railway Co.
Injunction may not issue under Anti-Injunction Act where state court proceeding stemmed from facts related to prior federal proceeding, but involved distinct claims. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 1, 2010
U.S. v. Leal-Felix
In calculating defendant’s criminal history, traffic violations resulting in imprisonment are treated as arrests for sentencing purposes. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 1, 2010
Stiefel v. Betchel Corp.
Plaintiff's discrimination claim fails where he did not show reasonable belief that employer was so biased that resort to hiring procedures would have been futile. 		Employment Law Nov. 1, 2010
Sevidal v. Target Corp.
Class certification is not proper where there is no way to identify class members who purchased mislabeled products from company’s website. 		Civil Procedure Oct. 31, 2010
Smith v. Mitchell
Habeas relief must issue where there is no verifiable evidence to support prosecution’s theory that defendant shook baby to death. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 31, 2010
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.