Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
04-1113
|
Sophocleus v. AL Dept. of Transp., et al.
Order |
|
Oct. 3, 2005 | ||
04-1224
|
Hogan v. United States
Order |
|
Oct. 3, 2005 | ||
04-1144
|
Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood
Order |
|
Oct. 3, 2005 | ||
04-10064
|
Carter v. Arkansas
Order |
|
Oct. 3, 2005 | ||
04-10295
|
Barnette v. United States
Order |
|
Oct. 3, 2005 | ||
04-1610
|
Saenz v. United States
Order |
|
Oct. 3, 2005 | ||
04-1620
|
Mills v. United States
Order |
|
Oct. 3, 2005 | ||
04-1667
|
Guttman v. G.T.S. Khalsa, et al.
Order |
|
Oct. 3, 2005 | ||
04-1698
|
Husband v. United States
Order |
|
Oct. 3, 2005 | ||
04-9022
|
Barton v. United States
Order |
|
Oct. 3, 2005 | ||
04-944
|
Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp.
Order |
|
Oct. 3, 2005 | ||
04-10394
|
Marshall v. United States
Order |
|
Oct. 3, 2005 | ||
04-10221
|
Higdon v. United States
Order |
|
Oct. 3, 2005 | ||
04-10379
|
Herrera v. United States
Order |
|
Oct. 3, 2005 | ||
04-10538
|
DeCarlo v. United States
Order |
|
Oct. 3, 2005 | ||
04-1382
|
U.S. v. Maxwell
Order |
|
Oct. 3, 2005 | ||
E034875
|
People v. Angulo
Court is not required to keep defendant's evaluations by court-appointed psychiatrist confidential. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 3, 2005 | |
S135381
|
Alford (Ricky Louis) on Habeas Corpus
Order |
|
Sep. 29, 2005 | ||
S136113
|
In re C. Michelle
Order |
|
Sep. 28, 2005 | ||
S135707
|
In re A. Angela
Order |
|
Sep. 28, 2005 | ||
G033796
|
Romano v. Mercury Insurance Co.
Uninsured motorist provider must cover claim of policyholder who was not compensated by insolvent insurer. |
Insurance |
|
Sep. 27, 2005 | |
01-56436
|
Johnson v. State of California
Order |
|
Sep. 27, 2005 | ||
03-636
|
Johnson v. California
Order |
|
Sep. 27, 2005 | ||
02-55368
|
Armentero v. INS
Order |
|
Sep. 27, 2005 | ||
04-10041
|
U.S. v. Gonzalez Inc.
Evidence used to support issuance of wiretaps failed to meet statutory necessity requirement. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 27, 2005 | |
01-35807
|
Berg v. Popham
Alaska hazardous waste disposal statute makes liable manufacturer of useful product that, when used as designed, releases hazardous substances. |
Torts |
|
Sep. 27, 2005 | |
03-50441
|
U.S. v. Barken
District court erred by applying Sentencing Guidelines as mandatory. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 27, 2005 | |
B176464
|
Cramer v. Superior Court of Los Angeles
Sums for transcript preparation may not be considered in calculating retirement benefits for county court reporters. |
Employment Law |
|
Sep. 27, 2005 | |
S135694
|
People v. Hill
Order |
|
Sep. 27, 2005 | ||
S131793
|
People v. Accredited Surety & Casualty
Order |
|
Sep. 27, 2005 |