This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

REPLACEMENT COPY OF TUESDAY, AUGUST 19, 2025

Name Category Published
Demery v. Arpaio
Installation of webcams in pretrial detention center violates due process rights of detainees.
Constitutional Law Oct. 5, 2004
Custer v. Hill
Because crimes plaintiff was twice tried for were not part of same criminal episode, his 'double jeopardy' claim fails.
Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 5, 2004
Bellajaro v. Schiltgen
Court may review denial of plaintiff's application for naturalization but scope of review is limited to ground for denial.
Immigration Oct. 5, 2004
Belishta v. Ashcroft
Order
Oct. 5, 2004
Chen v. Ashcroft
Board of appeals may not summarily affirm immigration judge's decision because this would violate streamlining regulations.
Immigration Oct. 5, 2004
Alvarez-Garcia v. Ashcroft
Excludable alien does not enjoy procedural rights afforded to deportable aliens.
Immigration Oct. 5, 2004
La Jolla Cove Motel and Hotel Apartments Inc. v. Superior Court (Jackman)
Attorneys may contact directors of represented corporation as long as directors' separate counsel consents to contact.
Attorneys Oct. 5, 2004
Santa Barbara County Flower and Nursery Growers Assn. Inc. v. County of Santa Barbara
County can fulfill duty to make environment assessment of greenhouse development in form other than environmental impact report.
Environmental Law Oct. 5, 2004
U.S. v. Kincade
DNA profiling of conditionally-released offenders does not violate Fourth Amendment.
Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 5, 2004
In re Jennings
Mistake of fact as to age is a defense against charge of buying alcohol for underage drinker who later causes serious accident.
Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 5, 2004
In re Seaton
Failure to raise issues about which petitioner had evidence at trial precludes consideration of those issues in habeas corpus proceeding.
Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 5, 2004
In re Ogea
Defendant convicted of drug possession while armed is not eligible for probation under Proposition 36.
Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 5, 2004
People v. Partida
Oct. 5, 2004
Ulysses D., a Minor
Photographs depicting minors and their parents in nude non-sexual positions constitute sexual abuse.
Juveniles Oct. 5, 2004
Williams v. Woodford
Court lacks jurisdiction to consider defendant's motion for relief from judgment under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b).
Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 5, 2004
Hall v. United States
Order
Oct. 5, 2004
Rhines v. Weber
Order
Oct. 5, 2004
Shepard v. United States
Order
Oct. 5, 2004
Durruthy v. Pastor
Order
Oct. 5, 2004
P.T. Pertamina v. Karaha Bodas Co., L.L.C.
Order
Oct. 5, 2004
Smith v. Gillis
Order
Oct. 5, 2004
Kant v. Bregman, Berbert & Schwartz, LLC
Order
Oct. 5, 2004
Morris Commun. Co., LLC v. PGA Tour Inc.
Order
Oct. 5, 2004
Terio v. United States
Order
Oct. 5, 2004
Martini v. Hendricks
Order
Oct. 5, 2004
Chavez v. United States
Order
Oct. 5, 2004
Grinzi v. San Diego Hospice Corp.
First Amendment applies only to state actions and expresses no public policy against terminations by private employers for speech-related activities.
Employment Law Oct. 5, 2004
Sophanthavong v. Palmateer
Juvenile alleging that his attorney misadvised him failed to establish ineffective assistance of counsel.
Juveniles Oct. 5, 2004
People v. Vasquez
Court's error in denying defendant's motion to recuse district attorney's office was not prejudicial.
Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 5, 2004
Calcano v. United States
Order
Oct. 5, 2004