Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S107283
|
People v. Fryman
Order |
|
Feb. 11, 2004 | ||
H024600
|
Marriage of Brinkman
Because there is no evidence supporting reduction of child support, trial court abused its discretion in modifying final dissolution judgment. |
Family Law |
|
Feb. 11, 2004 | |
F042652
|
Salvador M., a minor
Sister is entitled to presumed mother status of brother. |
Family Law |
|
Feb. 11, 2004 | |
S117796
|
People v. Marichalar
Order |
|
Feb. 11, 2004 | ||
B158551
|
Kitty-Anne Music Co. v. Swan
Rule of judicial estoppel does not apply where defendant has not taken inconsistent positions or disrupted orderly administration of justice. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Feb. 11, 2004 | |
B160288
|
California School of Culinary Arts v Lujan
California School of Culinary Arts deemed college and it's teacher's are exempt from overtime wages. |
Employment Law |
|
Feb. 11, 2004 | |
B161559
|
Juan G., a Minor
Court abused its discretion in requiring juvenile to maintain 'B' average as condition of probation. |
Juveniles |
|
Feb. 11, 2004 | |
A098103
|
People v. Ellison
|
|
Feb. 11, 2004 | ||
B158594
|
Wolkowitz v. Redland Insurance Co.
Insurer is not liable for refusing to settle lawsuit against policyholder. |
Insurance |
|
Feb. 11, 2004 | |
D040018
|
In re K.S., a Minor
Curfew violator's appeal denied. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Feb. 11, 2004 | |
S118180
|
People v. Martinez
Order |
|
Feb. 11, 2004 | ||
S113759
|
Taiheiyo Cement v. Superior Court (Jeong)
Order |
|
Feb. 11, 2004 | ||
S114470
|
Mitsubishi Materials v. Superior Court (Dillman)
Order |
|
Feb. 11, 2004 | ||
S117964
|
People v. Yartz
Order |
|
Feb. 11, 2004 | ||
A100952
|
Sequoia Union High School District v. Aurora Charter High School
School district must provide facilities to charter school that has students from district. |
Education |
|
Feb. 11, 2004 | |
A086991
|
Henley v. Philip Morris Inc.
Punitive damages award of $25 million against cigarette manufacturer must be reduced. |
Torts |
|
Feb. 11, 2004 | |
A097349
|
People v. Hard
Defendant who was detected during early stages of methamphetamine production was subject to volume enhancement. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 11, 2004 | |
S111494
|
People v. Konow
Order |
|
Feb. 11, 2004 | ||
S112260
|
In re S. B.
Order |
|
Feb. 11, 2004 | ||
F041528
|
Stanislaus County Dept. of Child Support Services v. Jensen
Custodial parent who concealed child until age of majority is barred from seeking support arrearages. |
Family Law |
|
Feb. 11, 2004 | |
F038536
|
Kyle F., a Minor
Father may attempt to demonstrate commitment to assume parental responsibilities toward child born to mother who was 16 at time of conception. |
Family Law |
|
Feb. 11, 2004 | |
D040040
|
People v. Murphy
Evidence obtained following violation of 'knock-notice' requirements must be suppressed. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 11, 2004 | |
B157997
|
Amin v. Khazindar
Trial court correctly held homestead exemption could not be asserted because it was barred by doctrine of res judicata. |
Real Property |
|
Feb. 11, 2004 | |
C042014
|
De Asis v. Dept. of Motor Vehicles
Trial court correctly found AB 60 did not become law where Legislature and governor acquiesce in retrieval of bill. |
Government |
|
Feb. 11, 2004 | |
02-1809
|
Hibbs v. Winn
Order |
|
Feb. 11, 2004 | ||
S104851
|
Haynes v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
Order |
|
Feb. 10, 2004 | ||
C042641
|
California Insurance Guarantee Assn. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
Insurance organization providing workers' compensation benefits arising from car accident is entitled to credit for underinsured motorist coverage. |
Workers' Compensation |
|
Feb. 10, 2004 | |
C031821
|
Moore v. State Board of Control
Crime victims' requests for restitution are untimely despite police's failure to advise victims of eligibility. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 10, 2004 | |
A096261
|
Russell v. Douvan
Court may not issue prohibitory injunction unless there is finding of threat of future harm. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Feb. 10, 2004 | |
G031386
|
The Archdiocese of Milwaukee v. Superior Court (Paino)
Archdiocese of Milwaukee is subject to specific personal jurisdiction in California. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Feb. 10, 2004 |