Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S109223
|
People v. Wollschlager
Order |
|
Jan. 23, 2004 | ||
S108187
|
People v. Stowell
Appeal of HIV testing order is subject to general rule requiring timely objection. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 23, 2004 | |
S107791
|
People v. Butler
Defendant may challenge sufficiency of HIV testing evidence on appeal even in absence of timely objection. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 23, 2004 | |
03-6539
|
Johnson v. California
Order |
|
Jan. 22, 2004 | ||
S121360
|
In re A.A.
Order |
|
Jan. 22, 2004 | ||
03-339
|
Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain
Order |
|
Jan. 22, 2004 | ||
03-95
|
PA State Police v. Suders
Order |
|
Jan. 22, 2004 | ||
02-1684
|
Yarborough v. Alvarado
Order |
|
Jan. 22, 2004 | ||
03-101
|
Norton, Sec. of Interior v. S. UT Wilderness Alliance
Order |
|
Jan. 22, 2004 | ||
02-682
|
Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko
Complaint alleging violations of Telecommunications Act of 1996 does not state claim under Section 2 of Sherman Act. |
Antitrust |
|
Jan. 21, 2004 | |
02-1060
|
Illinois v. Lidster
Traffic stop aimed at obtaining information from motorists regarding past crime did not violate Fourth Amendment. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 21, 2004 | |
02-1196
|
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Edwards
Investment scheme promising fixed rate of return is 'investment contract' subject to federal securities laws. |
Securities |
|
Jan. 21, 2004 | |
02-819
|
Kontrick v. Ryan
Debtor forfeits right to challenge creditor's claim as untimely if debtor fails to raise challenge before bankruptcy court reaches merits of claim. |
Bankruptcy |
|
Jan. 21, 2004 | |
02-628
|
Frew v. Hawkins
District court has authority to enforce consent decree requiring state agency to comply with Medicaid Act. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Jan. 21, 2004 | |
D040627
|
Padres LP v. Henderson
|
|
Jan. 21, 2004 | ||
H025229
|
People v. Superior Court (Cooper)
|
|
Jan. 21, 2004 | ||
99-71308
|
Mohamed Al-Saher v. INS
Amended opinion |
|
Jan. 21, 2004 | ||
00-70166
|
State of Alaska v. EPA
EPA has authority to decide whether state has compiled with 'Best Available Control Technology' requirements of Clean Air Act. |
Environmental Law |
|
Jan. 21, 2004 | |
02-749
|
Raytheon Co. v. Hernandez
Order |
|
Jan. 21, 2004 | ||
02-1657
|
Scarborough v. Principi
Order |
|
Jan. 21, 2004 | ||
02-11309
|
Smith v. Dretke
Order |
|
Jan. 21, 2004 | ||
02-1603
|
Beard, Sec., PA Doc v. Banks
Order |
|
Jan. 21, 2004 | ||
S109306
|
Dowhal v. Smithkline Beecham Consumer Healthcare etc. et al.
Order |
|
Jan. 20, 2004 | ||
98-55853
|
Regula v. Delta Family-Care Disability Survivorship Plan
Order |
|
Jan. 20, 2004 | ||
B160823
|
Citi-Wide Preferred Couriers Inc. v. Golden Eagle Insurance Corp.
|
|
Jan. 20, 2004 | ||
02-1423
|
Bellsouth Corp. v. Covad Communications Co.
Order |
|
Jan. 20, 2004 | ||
03-241
|
QWest Corp. v. Metronet Services Corp.
Order |
|
Jan. 20, 2004 | ||
03-285
|
Raney v. Gateway Computer Co.
Order |
|
Jan. 20, 2004 | ||
03-447
|
Smith v. McKenzie
Order |
|
Jan. 20, 2004 | ||
03-771
|
Cagna v. Weirton Steel Corp.
Order |
|
Jan. 20, 2004 |