Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F028940
|
People v. Lee
Jury is properly instructed on 'transferred intent doctrine' where evidence supports giving instruction. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 27, 2003 | |
H021239
|
Kahn v. East Side Union High School District
Swimmer who broke neck during practice assumed risk and cannot recover for negligence from school district or coach. |
Torts |
|
Aug. 27, 2003 | |
C043023
|
Paul H., a Minor
Alleged father of minor was prejudiced by juvenile court's failure to comply with statutory provisions regarding establishment of paternity. |
Family Law |
|
Aug. 27, 2003 | |
G025767
|
People v. Gonzalez
Violation of 'dual use issue' resulted in improper sentencing enhancement. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 27, 2003 | |
E028662
|
MacKinnon v. Truck Insurance Exchange
Insurance policy's pollution exclusion includes injuries arising from pesticide spraying incident. |
Insurance |
|
Aug. 26, 2003 | |
01-56879
|
Southern California Edison v. Lynch
Wholesale generators may not intervene as matter of right based on claim against third-party debtor. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Aug. 26, 2003 | |
02-1553
|
Stine v. Diamond (In re Flynn)
Co-owner may be ordered to pay costs of selling property in bankruptcy case. |
Bankruptcy |
|
Aug. 25, 2003 | |
03-1003
|
Tanzi v. Comerica Bank-California
Bankruptcy court did not err in using petition date to sustain creditor's objection for residence exemption purposes. |
Bankruptcy |
|
Aug. 25, 2003 | |
A099722
|
Harnedy v. Whitty
|
|
Aug. 22, 2003 | ||
S118111
|
Rogers v. Governing
Order |
|
Aug. 21, 2003 | ||
S117903
|
Schlaefli v. Superior Court (People)
Order |
|
Aug. 21, 2003 | ||
S116328
|
TEC Worldwide Inc. v. Dicker
Order |
|
Aug. 21, 2003 | ||
S116342
|
LSO Ltd. v. Stroh
Order |
|
Aug. 21, 2003 | ||
S109573
|
McMeans v. Scripps Health
Order |
|
Aug. 21, 2003 | ||
S114888
|
Parnell v. Adventist Health
Order |
|
Aug. 21, 2003 | ||
S108172
|
People v. Superior Court (Feather)
Order |
|
Aug. 21, 2003 | ||
S117238
|
Holley v. S.C.L.A. (MCA)
Order |
|
Aug. 21, 2003 | ||
S117829
|
Estate of Justice
Order |
|
Aug. 21, 2003 | ||
02-55436
|
Toia v. Fasano
Alien defendant who pleaded guilty prior to enactment of Immigration Act may apply for discretionary relief from deportation. |
Immigration |
|
Aug. 20, 2003 | |
02-70430
|
Padilla v. Ashcroft
INS was not required to hold hearing before reinstating alien's removal order. |
Immigration |
|
Aug. 20, 2003 | |
01-56320
|
Chein v. Shumsky
Order |
|
Aug. 19, 2003 | ||
00-15994
|
Ramirez v. Galaza
Favorable termination rule doesn't apply to suits brought under 42. U.S.C. Section 1983, challenging disciplinary hearing not affecting length of prisoner's confinement. |
Civil Rights |
|
Aug. 19, 2003 | |
01-99005
|
Alcala v. Woodford
Court upholds conditional habeas petition of defendant who was sentenced to death for murder of 12-year old girl. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 19, 2003 | |
01-56046
|
Grant v. City of Long Beach
Amended opinion |
|
Aug. 19, 2003 | ||
00-55585
|
Bianchi v. Rylaarsdam (Bank of America National Trust & Savings Assn.)
Federal district court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to hear appeal from final judgment of state court. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Aug. 19, 2003 | |
02-15881
|
Biggs v. Terhune
Board of Prison Terms' denial of parole is supported by some evidence and satisfies due process requirements. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 19, 2003 | |
01-17566
|
Doe v. State of Hawaii Dept. of Education
School vice-principal who disciplined student by taping head to tree is not entitled to qualified immunity. |
Civil Rights |
|
Aug. 19, 2003 | |
B159465
|
Zapanta v. Universal Care Inc.
Court improperly granted summary judgment motion where plaintiffs voluntarily filed request for dismissal. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Aug. 19, 2003 | |
D039059
|
Iliff v. Dustrud
Application for renewal of default judgment was timely within 10-year period. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Aug. 19, 2003 | |
B157323
|
Continental Insurance Co. v. Columbus Line Inc.
Owner failed to establish that carrier's liability for damages to shipped goods exceeded statutory maximum. |
Maritime Law |
|
Aug. 19, 2003 |