Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
D037855
|
People v. Frazer
|
|
May 21, 2003 | ||
A096965
|
Decker v. Yorkton Securities Inc.
Claim alleging brokers negligently deposited stock certificates requires subjective knowledge of significant probability of adverse claim. |
Securities |
|
May 21, 2003 | |
B156445
|
Joshua S., a minor
Juvenile court abused discretion by terminating jurisdiction over children without determining their best interests. |
Family Law |
|
May 21, 2003 | |
B157086
|
Reed v. Mutual Service Corp.
Arbitration panel did not exceed authority when dismissing claim in pre-hearing. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 21, 2003 | |
B162059
|
Bird, Marella, Boxer & Wolpert v. Superior Court (Reiner)
|
|
May 21, 2003 | ||
F038894
|
People v. Salinas
|
|
May 21, 2003 | ||
B155518
|
Olson v. Cohen
|
|
May 21, 2003 | ||
A092852
|
People v. Alas
Jury's note stating Juror No. 3 could not follow the law did not constitute juror misconduct requiring removal. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 20, 2003 | |
02-15378
|
California Pro-Life Council Inc. v. Getman
California may regulate express ballot-measure advocacy. |
Constitutional Law |
|
May 20, 2003 | |
01-10415
|
U.S. v. Reyna-Tapia
District courts may delegate Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 11 colloquy duties to magistrate judges with defendant's consent. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 20, 2003 | |
01-71941
|
California State Legislature Board v. Mineta
Federal Railroad Administration properly concluded that 'duty call' does not constitute violation of the Hours of Service Laws. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 20, 2003 | |
01-57053
|
Harris Rutsky & Co. Insurance Services Inc. v. Bell & Clements Limited
England-based corporation's activities demonstrate it availed itself to privileges of conducting business in California sufficient to confer personal jurisdiction of court. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 20, 2003 | |
99-56570
|
Ingle v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.
Unconscionable nature of employer's arbitration agreement renders it unenforceable under California contract law. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 20, 2003 | |
01-35849
|
Paladin Associates Inc. v. Montana Power Co.
There are no violations of antitrust laws where procompetitive justifications plainly outweigh alleged anticompetitive effects. |
Antitrust |
|
May 20, 2003 | |
01-57107
|
Warren v. Fox Family Worldwide Inc.
Plaintiff has no standing to sue for copyright infringement because plaintiff's musical compositions were created as works for hire. |
Intellectual Property |
|
May 20, 2003 | |
01-35950
|
Miranda B. v. Kitzhaber
States do not enjoy Eleventh Amendment immunity with regards to claims under Title II of the American Disabilities Act. |
Constitutional Law |
|
May 20, 2003 | |
01-615
|
Opinion of Bill Lockyer
Two parcels of land were legally created when public agency used eminent domain to acquire land in 1965. |
Government |
|
May 20, 2003 | |
02-57033
|
Gebin v. Mineta
Order |
|
May 20, 2003 | ||
99-36194
|
Jenkins v. Johnson
Because state court assessed merit of petitioner's claim before dismissing it as untimely, petition is considered properly filed within meaning of AEDPA. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 20, 2003 | |
B143381
|
Acosta v. Synthetic Industries Inc.
Manufacturers of single purpose products incorporated into mass-produced homes are subject to strict products liability to homeowner. |
Torts |
|
May 20, 2003 | |
H022655
|
People v. Ranger Insurance Co.
Bail of convicted defendant who failed to appear for sentencing is forfeited. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 20, 2003 | |
B145348
|
People v. Ranger Insurance Co.
Bail bond must be forfeited if defendant pleads no contest and then fails to appear for sentencing. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 20, 2003 | |
D036160
|
Swiderski v. Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, Hynes & Lerach
Mere initiation of prearbitration procedures does not satisfy requirement to exhaust arbitration remedy and do not support granting motion for new trial. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 20, 2003 | |
A097337
|
People v. Ledesma
Police were entitled to conduct cursory sweep of premises for unknown occupants prior to conducting probation search. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 20, 2003 | |
02-1096
|
Ford Motor Co. v. Estate of Tommy Smith
Order |
|
May 19, 2003 | ||
02-1097
|
Ford Motor Co. v. Romo
Order |
|
May 19, 2003 | ||
126orig
|
State of Kansas v. States of Nebraska and Colorado
Order |
|
May 19, 2003 | ||
02-337
|
Breuer v. Jim's Concrete of Brevard Inc.
Lawsuit under FLSA filed in state court may be removed to federal court. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 19, 2003 | |
02-281
|
Inyo County v. Paiute-Shoshone Indians
Tribe may not assert claim under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 in order to preserve its right to sovereign immunity. |
Native American Affairs |
|
May 19, 2003 | |
02-1212
|
City of Los Angeles v. David
Order |
|
May 19, 2003 |