For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
U.S. v. Navajo Nation
Tribe's claim for compensation from government fails because it is not derived from any liability-imposing provision of Indian Mineral Leasing Act. 		Native American Affairs Mar. 11, 2003
Boeing Co. v. United States
Treasury regulation that governs taxable income for research and development expenses is valid. 		Taxation Mar. 11, 2003
Moseley v. Secret Catalogue Inc.
Claim for trademark dilution requires proof of actual harm to mark's distinctive quality. 		Intellectual Property Mar. 11, 2003
Connecticut Dept. of Public Safety v. Doe
Law requiring registration of convicted sexual offenders does not violate procedural due process. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 11, 2003
Ewing v. California
Sentence resulting from Three Strikes Law is not grossly disproportionate and does not violate Eighth Amendment. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 11, 2003
Lockyer v. Andrade
Appellate court did not unreasonably apply clearly established law by affirming defendant's sentence under California's Three Strikes Law for petty theft conviction. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 11, 2003
Smith v. Doe
Because Alaska Sex Offender Registration Act is nonpunitive, its retroactive application does not violate prohibition of ex post facto laws. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 11, 2003
U.S. v. Crawford
Parole search conducted solely to elicit information about prior crime was unconstitutional. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 11, 2003
Simboli v. Crosby, Sec., FL Doc
Order 		Mar. 11, 2003
In re Fletcher
Order 		Mar. 11, 2003
In re Antonio
Order 		Mar. 11, 2003
Lilley v. City of Sacramento
Order 		Mar. 11, 2003
Secress-Zgutis v. Superior Court (Secress)
Opinion 		Mar. 11, 2003
Russian River Community v. Sonoma
Order 		Mar. 11, 2003
Marriage of Wichmann
Order 		Mar. 11, 2003
Southern California Edison v. Lynch
Order 		Mar. 11, 2003
Silva-Jacinto v. INS
Order 		Mar. 11, 2003
Entergy Louisiana Inc. v. Louisiana Public Serv. Comm.
Order 		Mar. 11, 2003
Mayle v. Brown
Order 		Mar. 10, 2003
Herbert v. United States
Order 		Mar. 10, 2003
Sifford v. United States
Order 		Mar. 10, 2003
McGrath v. Chia
Order 		Mar. 10, 2003
Quick v. United States
Order 		Mar. 10, 2003
Scheidler v. National Organization for Women Inc.
Anti-abortion groups did not commit extortion under Hobbs Act. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 10, 2003
Doe v. Otte
Alaska Sex Offender Registration Act violates Ex Post Facto Clause of U.S. Constitution. 		Constitutional Law Mar. 9, 2003
Holley v. Crank
Corporate owners and officers may be held vicariously liable for employees' violations of Fair Housing Act. 		Civil Rights Mar. 9, 2003
Andrade v. California Attorney General
Life sentence for defendant convicted of petty theft with prior convictions for non-violent crimes is unconstitutional. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 9, 2003
Redwood Theaters Inc. v. Davison (In re Davison)
Debtor who obtained judgment that debt was nondischargeable is not entitled to attorney fees. 		Bankruptcy Mar. 7, 2003
California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform v. Bonta
Mar. 7, 2003
Kipperman v. Proulx (In re Burns)
Amended opinion 		Mar. 6, 2003
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.