Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
01CA0977
|
Colburn v. Kopit
Action for negligence and breach of fiduciary duty against unlicensed psychotherapist must be brought within three years. |
Torts |
|
Jun. 25, 2002 | |
01CA1146
|
Ford v. Summertree Lane LLC
Conveyance of property by warranty deed did not transfer right to assert tort claims against developer and broker. |
Torts |
|
Jun. 25, 2002 | |
01CA1180
|
Widder v. Durango School District No. 9-R
School district employee was not entitled to new hearing before trial court after dismissal by school board. |
Employment Law |
|
Jun. 25, 2002 | |
01-4129
|
Davis v. Mineta
Because environmental assessment of highway project was inadequate, district court must grant preliminary injunction barring further road construction pending resolution on merits. |
Environmental Law |
|
Jun. 25, 2002 | |
01-0392
|
Steer v. Eggleston
Trial court did not err by reimbursing plaintiff attorney fees and expenses from corpus of arbitration award. |
Attorneys |
|
Jun. 24, 2002 | |
00-50048
|
U.S. v. Ruiz
Defendant's right to receive undisclosed favorable evidence from prosecution cannot be waived through plea agreement. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 24, 2002 | |
S088712
|
People v. Storm
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 24, 2002 | |
S091459
|
People v. Totari
Review granted |
|
Jun. 24, 2002 | ||
S092183
|
People v. Farell
Order |
|
Jun. 24, 2002 | ||
S093628
|
City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court (Brandon)
Order |
|
Jun. 24, 2002 | ||
S096127
|
Zuckerman v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners of State of California
Order |
|
Jun. 24, 2002 | ||
70413-9
|
Marriage of Litowitz
Husband in marital dissolution proceeding was not entitled to keep cryopreserved preembryos. |
Family Law |
|
Jun. 24, 2002 | |
27255-5
|
State v. Hall
Defendant is guilty of incest with biological daughter whom he relinquished for adoption. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 24, 2002 | |
B139930
|
Track Mortgage Group Inc. v. Crusader Insurance Co.
|
|
Jun. 24, 2002 | ||
C036340
|
People v. Jimenez
|
|
Jun. 24, 2002 | ||
A095725
|
Robinson v. Chin & Hensolt
|
|
Jun. 24, 2002 | ||
G022069
|
Esberg v. Union Oil Co. of California
Excluding worker over age of 40 from employer's educational assistance program does not constitute age discrimination. |
Employment Law |
|
Jun. 23, 2002 | |
00-1737
|
Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York Inc. v. Village of Stratton
Ordinance which makes it misdemeanor for Jehovah Witnesses to engage in door-to-door advocacy without registering and receiving permit violates First Amendment. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Jun. 23, 2002 | |
01-301
|
Carey v. Saffold
Deadline to file federal habeas petition is tolled during interval between denial of one state petition and filing of next one. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 23, 2002 | |
01-463
|
U.S. v. Fior D'Italia, Inc.
Aggregate estimation method is employed when computing FICA taxes of a restaurant. |
Taxation |
|
Jun. 23, 2002 | |
01-631
|
U.S. v. Drayton
Fourth Amendment does not require police to advise bus passengers of their right not to cooperate and to refuse consent to searches. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 23, 2002 | |
01-1385
|
Horns v. Banks
Federal court must apply 'Teague' analysis independent of Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act when considering habeas petition. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 23, 2002 | |
01-682
|
Barnes v. Gorman
Punitive damages may not be awarded in private suits brought under Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of Rehabilitation Act. |
Civil Rights |
|
Jun. 23, 2002 | |
01-1423
|
Harris v. U.S. Trustee (In re Harris)
Federal trustee opposing bankruptcy relief failed to show debtors' expenses were unreasonable. |
Bankruptcy |
|
Jun. 23, 2002 | |
01-1207
|
Demos v. Brown (In re Graves)
Denial of post-hearing motion challenging permanent injunction is error because there was inadequate notice that injunction would be considered. |
Bankruptcy |
|
Jun. 23, 2002 | |
99-36106
|
Bergt v. Retirement Plan for Pilots Employed by MarkAir Inc.
Employee is entitled to retirement benefits despite conflict in plan documents regarding eligibility. |
Employment Law |
|
Jun. 23, 2002 | |
S106486
|
People v. Smith
Order |
|
Jun. 23, 2002 | ||
USSC
|
Unger v. Manchin
Order |
|
Jun. 23, 2002 | ||
00-665
|
Montemayor v. Corporate Health Ins.
Order |
|
Jun. 23, 2002 | ||
01-1028
|
San Antonio, Tx v. Stucky
Order |
|
Jun. 23, 2002 |