Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
00-1765
|
Pioneer Magnetics Inc. v. Micro Linear Corp.
Order |
|
Jun. 3, 2002 | ||
00-1946
|
Insituform Technologies v. CAT Contracting
Order |
|
Jun. 3, 2002 | ||
01-1230
|
Smith v. Suthers
Opinion |
|
Jun. 3, 2002 | ||
00-1266
|
Blum v. United States
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 3, 2002 | |
01-2161
|
US v. Herrell
Order |
|
Jun. 3, 2002 | ||
96-O-03531
|
Blum v. State Bar
Attorney's actual suspension is decreased to 30 days because of overwhelming mitigating factors. |
Attorneys |
|
Jun. 3, 2002 | |
01-740
|
Mycogen Plant Science v. Monsanto Co.
Order |
|
Jun. 2, 2002 | ||
01-1413
|
Jones v. French
Order |
|
Jun. 2, 2002 | ||
G023666
|
People v. Valencia
Defendant doesn't commit burglary by only removing window screen and no part of his body passes beyond closed window. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 2, 2002 | |
02-4007
|
Medel v. Galetka
Order |
|
Jun. 2, 2002 | ||
01-8035
|
U.S. v. Quinones-Herrera
Order |
|
Jun. 2, 2002 | ||
01-4161
|
U.S. v. Bahe
Order |
|
Jun. 2, 2002 | ||
02-3021
|
Timley v. Nelson
Order |
|
Jun. 2, 2002 | ||
01-6391
|
Winrow v. Hines
Order |
|
Jun. 2, 2002 | ||
01-834
|
Moore v. Texas
Order |
|
Jun. 2, 2002 | ||
01-35
|
Senior Technologies Inc. v. R.F. Technologies Inc.
Order |
|
Jun. 2, 2002 | ||
01-269
|
CREO Productions Inc. v. Dainippon Screen
Order |
|
Jun. 2, 2002 | ||
01-423
|
Semitool Inc. v. Novellus Systems Inc.
Order |
|
Jun. 2, 2002 | ||
01-506
|
Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Space Systems/Loral Inc.
Order |
|
Jun. 2, 2002 | ||
01-541
|
AccuScan Inc. v. Xerox Corp.
Order |
|
Jun. 2, 2002 | ||
01-677
|
PTI Technologies Inc. v. Pall Corp. Techn. Inc.
Order |
|
Jun. 2, 2002 | ||
01-1559
|
U.S. v. Sabry
Order |
|
May 31, 2002 | ||
00-6367
|
U.S. v. Kell
Order |
|
May 31, 2002 | ||
01-4119
|
Haymond v. Eighth District Electrical Benefit Fund
Order |
|
May 31, 2002 | ||
98-56200
|
Alameda Books Inc. v. City of Los Angeles
Order |
|
May 30, 2002 | ||
02SA59
|
Kerns v. Kerns
Procedure for filing notice of lis pendens is available to party in any action affecting title to real property regardless of where action is brought. |
Real Property |
|
May 29, 2002 | |
B144733
|
Roger H. Proulx & Co. v. Crest-Liners Inc.
|
|
May 29, 2002 | ||
99-1327
|
Metro Wastewater Reclamation District v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.
Order |
|
May 29, 2002 | ||
00-6398
|
Wells v. Redwine
Order |
|
May 29, 2002 | ||
00-1699
|
BellSOUTH Telecom Inc. v. NC Utilities Commn.
Order |
|
May 28, 2002 |