Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
01-3088
|
Robleado v. Deffenbaugh Industries, Inc.
Order |
|
Apr. 25, 2002 | ||
01-2327
|
Ferguson v. New Mexico Corrections Department
Order |
|
Apr. 25, 2002 | ||
01-2274
|
Ardrey v. Bravo
Order |
|
Apr. 25, 2002 | ||
01-7092 & 01-7100
|
US v. Jones
Order |
|
Apr. 25, 2002 | ||
01-7049
|
Myers v. Mahaffey
Order |
|
Apr. 25, 2002 | ||
01-8040
|
US v. Norton
Order |
|
Apr. 25, 2002 | ||
01-3384
|
Rush v. State of Kansas
Order |
|
Apr. 25, 2002 | ||
S104354
|
Citizens for Jobs and the Economy v. County of Orange
Order |
|
Apr. 25, 2002 | ||
S104748
|
People v. Harake
Order |
|
Apr. 25, 2002 | ||
S094721
|
Ventura Hospitality Inc. v. Superior Court (First Continental Bank)
Order |
|
Apr. 25, 2002 | ||
S104727
|
Blaisdell v. Whittier City School District
Order |
|
Apr. 25, 2002 | ||
S105561
|
Steve M. v. Superior Court (Los Angeles County Dept. of Children & Family Services)
Order |
|
Apr. 25, 2002 | ||
S105566
|
Bayer v. Superior Court (People)
Order |
|
Apr. 25, 2002 | ||
S104355
|
Mauermann v. Superior Court (St. George's Medical Clinic)
Order |
|
Apr. 25, 2002 | ||
S105877
|
Ulman v. Superior Court (Quagletti)
Order |
|
Apr. 25, 2002 | ||
01-2040
|
Sweet v. Williams
Order |
|
Apr. 25, 2002 | ||
01-2323
|
Frazier v. Johnson
Order |
|
Apr. 25, 2002 | ||
01-7128
|
Tabb v. Dunkle
Order |
|
Apr. 25, 2002 | ||
01-6233
|
Fleenor v. Scott
Order |
|
Apr. 25, 2002 | ||
01-5059
|
Renfro v. Scott
Order |
|
Apr. 25, 2002 | ||
01CA1049
|
Curragh Queensland Mining Limited v. Dresser Industries, Inc.
Opinion |
|
Apr. 25, 2002 | ||
01-1391
|
U.S. v. Thayer
Order |
|
Apr. 25, 2002 | ||
99-15641
|
Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
Order |
|
Apr. 24, 2002 | ||
01-6412
|
Wilcox v. Peterson
Order |
|
Apr. 24, 2002 | ||
98-56468
|
Firestone v. Southern California Gas Co.
Federal law pre-empts state law claims that are 'inextricably intertwined' with meaning of terms in collective bargaining agreement. |
Labor Law |
|
Apr. 24, 2002 | |
00-5206
|
U.S. v. Thompson
Sentence enhancement based on number of child pornography computer files was correctly applied. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 24, 2002 | |
01-5039
|
McBride v. CITGO Petroleum Corp.
When employee fails to exhaust administrative remedies, dismissal of ADA claim is proper. |
Employment Law |
|
Apr. 24, 2002 | |
00-3013
|
Rogers v. U.S.
Recharacterization of transaction as a sale rather than loan for tax purposes is proper under substance-over-form doctrine. |
Taxation |
|
Apr. 24, 2002 | |
01-6097
|
U.S. v. Angevine
Professor had no reasonable expectation of privacy when downloading child pornography on university computer. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 24, 2002 | |
00-55051
|
Papa v. United States
Statute of limitations period for minor children's 'Bivens' claims is tolled until they reach age of majority or file suit. |
Immigration |
|
Apr. 24, 2002 |