| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
S104488
|
Cables & Accessories Inc. v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Co.
Order |
|
May 6, 2002 | ||
|
S097661
|
Flores v. City and County of San Francisco
Order |
|
May 6, 2002 | ||
|
S091641
|
Raney v. The California Dept. of Developmental Services
Order |
|
May 6, 2002 | ||
|
S104892
|
Paramount Contractors and Developers Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Interest at Lloyds of London
Order |
|
May 6, 2002 | ||
|
S104286
|
Peck v. Driscoll
Order |
|
May 6, 2002 | ||
|
S105088
|
Tompkins v. California Insurance Group
Order |
|
May 6, 2002 | ||
|
S104203
|
Burns v. Nature's Best
Order |
|
May 6, 2002 | ||
|
S105085
|
Ananda Church of Self-Realization v. Massachusetts Bay Insurance Co.
Order |
|
May 6, 2002 | ||
|
S105787
|
Akers v. County of San Diego
Order |
|
May 6, 2002 | ||
|
S104061
|
McGrade v. Glendale Unified School District
Order |
|
May 6, 2002 | ||
|
S102031
|
Nishihama v. City and County of San Francisco
Order |
|
May 6, 2002 | ||
|
S105453
|
CIBC Oppenheimer Corp. v. Friedman
Order |
|
May 6, 2002 | ||
|
S105764
|
People v. Cortez
Order |
|
May 6, 2002 | ||
|
01-6370
|
Hernandez-Escarsega v. Morris
Order |
|
May 6, 2002 | ||
|
01-6125
|
Zinke v. The Honorable Rodney E. Slater
Order |
|
May 6, 2002 | ||
|
00-1395
|
Farmer v. Perrill
Issue of whether inmate's rights were violated by strip search could not be resolved at summary judgment stage. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
May 6, 2002 | |
|
01-10301
|
U.S. v. Hernandez-Castellanos
Felony endangerment under Arizona law is not, categorically, an aggravated felony for sentence enhancement purposes. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 6, 2002 | |
|
00-71019
|
Vargas-Garcia v. INS
Combination of Notice of Appeal form, BIA's strict requirements and failure to give warning of appeal dismissal violated alien's due process rights. |
Immigration |
|
May 6, 2002 | |
|
E022209
|
Haas v. County of San Bernardino
Where county unilaterally selects and pays for administrative hearing officer, due process is violated. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 6, 2002 | |
|
A080542
|
People v. Loyd
Two or more offenses of the same class may be joined together unless party seeking severance establishes substantial danger of prejudice. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 6, 2002 | |
|
49560-7
|
Bingham v. Demopolis
Creditor is time-barred from proceeding with nonjudicial foreclosure. |
Real Property |
|
May 6, 2002 | |
|
70699-9
|
Ford v. Trendwest Resorts Inc.
Damages for breach of an employment at-will contract do not include lost earnings. |
Employment Law |
|
May 6, 2002 | |
|
26367-0
|
Miller v. City of Bainbridge Island
Business destroyed in fire cannot be rebuilt without showing it was lawful nonconforming use in residential district. |
Real Property |
|
May 6, 2002 | |
|
26690-3
|
Bob Pearson Construction Inc. v. First Community Bank of Washington
Construction company seeking to enforce lien is barred from suing banks that were not served within time limit. |
Business Law |
|
May 6, 2002 | |
|
00-0024
|
Southern Pacific Transportation Company Inc. v. State of Arizona
Tax not authorizing or contemplating apportionment is not constitutionally applied in railroad transportation case. |
Taxation |
|
May 6, 2002 | |
|
00-1250
|
US Airways Inc. v. Barnett
Disabled employee may show special circumstances warrant accommodation that conflicts with seniority system. |
Employment Law |
|
May 5, 2002 | |
|
S104555
|
White v. Contreras
Order |
|
May 5, 2002 | ||
|
01-7045
|
U.S. v. Solomon
Order |
|
May 3, 2002 | ||
|
S105493
|
Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh
Order |
|
May 3, 2002 | ||
|
01-16111
|
San Francisco Baykeeper v. Whitman
Amended opinion |
|
May 3, 2002 |
For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424. To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com