This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

REPLACEMENT COPY OF TUESDAY, AUGUST 19, 2025

Name Category Published
National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Kozeny
Order
Oct. 7, 2001
Garner v. Yellow Freight System
Order
Oct. 7, 2001
Stansbury v. McKune
Order
Oct. 7, 2001
U.S. v. Archuleta
Order
Oct. 7, 2001
U.S. v. Andino
Order
Oct. 7, 2001
U.S. v. Speal
Order
Oct. 7, 2001
U.S. v. Owens
Order
Oct. 7, 2001
U.S. v. Libretti
Order
Oct. 7, 2001
Ramey v. Reinertson
Supplemental security income recipients are entitled to Medicaid benefits under Colorado's medical assistance program.
Administrative Agencies Oct. 7, 2001
Patton v. Massanari
Order
Oct. 7, 2001
Woodworker's Supply v. Los Alamos technical Associates
Order
Oct. 7, 2001
Wyoming Outfitters Association v. Wyoming Game and Fish Commission
Order
Oct. 7, 2001
U.S. v. Miller
Order
Oct. 7, 2001
U.S. v. Spring
Order
Oct. 7, 2001
Lewis v. Lewis & Clark Marine Inc.
District court cannot dissolve injunction against state court proceedings in single claimant limitation of liability case when claimant guaranteed ship owner's right to limitation.
Maritime Law Oct. 5, 2001
U.S. v. Recio
Court finds insufficient evidence of guilt of pre-seizure conspiracy where defendants' conduct reveals general guilt of post-seizure pick-up of contraband.
Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 5, 2001
U.S. v. Castro-Hernandez
Use of child as decoy while smuggling drugs justifies upward adjustment under federal sentencing guidelines.
Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 5, 2001
U.S. v. Lopez
Defendant isn't entitled to notice prior to sentencing that participation in mental health program would be condition of supervised release.
Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 5, 2001
U.S. v. Taylor
Defendant is not guilty of disorderly conduct where incident in question was not public.
Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 5, 2001
Breeden v. Clark County School District
Order
Oct. 4, 2001
U.S. v. Kyllo
Order
Oct. 4, 2001
Aguirre-Aguirre v. INS
Order
Oct. 4, 2001
Garvin v. Farmon
Violation of defendant's rights in primary interrogation will not suppress subsequent valid confession.
Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 4, 2001
U.S. v. Berry
Defendant's sentence was properly increased for being leader of enterprise to steal mail.
Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 4, 2001
Hensley v. Northwest Permanente P.C. Retirement Plan and Trust
In denying benefits, ERISA plan administrators didn't abuse discretion by applying W-2 definition of employee instead of federal common law definition.
Employment Law Oct. 4, 2001
Mayweathers v. Newland
Prison may not discipline Muslim inmates for missing work to attend religious services.
Prisoners Rights Oct. 4, 2001
Boeing Co. v. United States
IRS properly applied Treasury Regulation 1.861-8(e)93) to allocate company's research and development costs to its export sales.
Taxation Oct. 4, 2001
Kieslich v. U.S. (In re Kieslich)
Because government failed to object before bankruptcy court to its retention of jurisdiction in debtor's suit, government waives that argument.
Bankruptcy Oct. 4, 2001
U.S. v. Basalo
Court improperly departed downward eight levels from applicable sentencing guideline where no evidence existed that alleged government misconduct effected outcome of proceedings.
Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 4, 2001
Toscano v. Professional Golfers' Assoc.
No direct evidence supported plaintiff's allegations that Professional Golfers' Association violated Sherman Antitrust Act by conspiring to restrain trade.
Antitrust Oct. 4, 2001