| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
18-9639
|
Ash v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
|
19-5652
|
Bettcher v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
|
19-5325
|
Gomez v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
|
19-5763
|
Lara-Garcia v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
|
19-5908
|
Combs v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
|
19-6025
|
Segovia-Lopez v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
|
19-6186
|
Burris v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
|
19-6908
|
Olvera-Martinez v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
|
19-7684
|
Powell v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
|
20-5434
|
Bates v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
|
20-5584
|
Matthews v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
|
20-6130
|
Greer v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
|
20-6225
|
Lister v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
|
20-6459
|
Garrett v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
|
20-6539
|
Lopez-Rodriguez v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
|
20-6541
|
Pineda-Campuzano v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
|
20-6552
|
Arreola-Mendoza v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
|
20-7280
|
Vickers v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
|
19-6114
|
Anderson v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
|
19-6504
|
McGee v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
|
19-6633
|
Ausberry v. U.S.
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
|
20-1295
|
U.S. v. Green
Order |
|
Jun. 22, 2021 | ||
|
19-1434
|
U.S. v. Arthrex, Inc.
Unreviewable authority wielded by Administrative Patent Judges during inter partes review is incompatible with their appointment by Secretary of Commerce to inferior office. |
Patent Law |
|
J. Roberts | Jun. 22, 2021 |
|
20-512
|
National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. Alston
District court did not err in enjoining defendant's caps on education-related benefits because defendant could have imposed less restrictive restraints on those benefits. |
Antitrust |
|
N. Gorsuch | Jun. 22, 2021 |
|
20-222
|
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System
At class certification, in assessing whether alleged misrepresentation had price impact, courts must take into account 'all' record evidence relevant to price impact. |
Securities |
|
A. Barrett | Jun. 22, 2021 |
|
19-30269
|
U.S. v. Parlor
Imposition of multiple-firearms enhancement was proper because firearms found during search of defendant's house were sufficiently connected to his earlier possession of firearms for which he was charged. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. Bress | Jun. 22, 2021 |
|
18-72786
|
Kaur v. Garland
Evidence of petitioner's husband's death, her new status as widow, her in-laws' threats, and increasing violence towards women and particularly widows in India presented material changed country circumstances. |
Immigration |
|
S. Mendoza | Jun. 22, 2021 |
|
19-35922
|
Estate of Finnigan v. U.S.
Summary judgment to government was proper in action seeking quiet title to real property that had been granted by federal government to Railroad Company, but was abandoned many years ago. |
Real Property |
|
R. Clifton | Jun. 22, 2021 |
|
20-15762
|
Meland v. Weber
Plaintiff plausibly alleged that Senate Bill 826 requires shareholders to discriminate on basis of sex when exercising their corporate voting rights, which adequately alleged injury in fact. |
Constitutional Law |
|
S. Ikuta | Jun. 22, 2021 |
|
S260130
|
People v. Ollo
Voluntariness of victim's ingestion of drugs is key consideration in determination of whether defendant personally inflicts great bodily injury in drug furnishing context. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
G. Liu | Jun. 22, 2021 |
For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424. To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com