Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
B134049
|
People v. Howze
|
|
Jul. 1, 2001 | ||
S084057
|
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Superior Court (In re Powerine Oil Co. Inc.)
Insurance company is not obligated to indemnify policyholder for environmental expenses ordered by administrative agency. |
Insurance |
|
Jul. 1, 2001 | |
S082133
|
State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Superior Court (Schaefer Ambulance Service Inc.)
Workers' compensation insurer isn't immune from civil liability when it misallocates insureds' financial information resulting in higher premiums for insureds. |
Workers' Compensation |
|
Jul. 1, 2001 | |
S066991
|
People v. Sanchez
Gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated is not lesser included offense of murder. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 1, 2001 | |
B136458
|
People v. Munoz
Sequential designation of judges authorized to consider wiretap applications does not violate statute or legislative intent. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 1, 2001 | |
A084426
|
People v. Currie
Right to impartial jury isn't violated because underrepresentation of group not caused by selection process but by members' failure to appear. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 1, 2001 | |
G026848
|
McCoy v. Superior Court of Orange County
Arbitration clause is unconscionable and unenforceable where employer mandates acceptance of it as condition of employment. |
Employment Law |
|
Jul. 1, 2001 | |
B135439
|
Carole Ring & Assoc. v. Nicastro
Pursuant to statute, prevailing party is entitled to post-arbitration attorney fees and costs, notwithstanding arbitrator's denial of same at arbitration |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 1, 2001 | |
B146372
|
Jaime M., a Minor
Juvenile's status must first be determined by delinquency and dependency court before placement can be authorized. |
Juveniles |
|
Jul. 1, 2001 | |
B139266
|
People v. Cleveland
Consecutive sentence imposed by judge isn't factual determination which increased defendant's penalty and must be determined by jury. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 1, 2001 | |
B144094
|
Fuller v. Superior Court (IPC International Corp.)
Right to protection against self incrimination may not be invoked before depositions are taken. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Jul. 1, 2001 | |
B145442
|
Briggs v. Superior Court (People)
Judge's disqualification is untimely because he had already conducted pretrial hearing involving contested fact issues. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jul. 1, 2001 | |
A088368
|
Van Ness v. Blue Cross of California
Insurer does not breach contract by issuing health insurance policy that clearly provides reduced benefits for non-participating health care providers. |
Insurance |
|
Jul. 1, 2001 | |
B140352
|
People v. Lavin
Oregon prisoner's handwritten demand is not sufficient to trigger 180-day deadline to bring charges in California. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 29, 2001 | |
A089533
|
Ratcliff Architects v. Vanir Construction Management Inc.
Demurrers were properly sustained against party that did not have standing to sue under terms of contract. |
Contracts |
|
Jun. 29, 2001 | |
S096910
|
Currie v. City of San Diego
Order |
|
Jun. 29, 2001 | ||
S095677
|
Briggs v. Superior Court (People)
Order |
|
Jun. 29, 2001 | ||
S097047
|
Advanced Electronics Inc. v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co.
Order |
|
Jun. 29, 2001 | ||
S097147
|
People v. Slyvester
Order |
|
Jun. 29, 2001 | ||
S096833
|
Dube v. Dept. of Real Estate
Order |
|
Jun. 29, 2001 | ||
S096738
|
Popkin v. Superior Court (People)
Order |
|
Jun. 29, 2001 | ||
S094518
|
People v. Perez
Order |
|
Jun. 29, 2001 | ||
S097143
|
Insurance Commissioner of the State of California v. Professionals Prototype I Insurance Co.
Order |
|
Jun. 29, 2001 | ||
S096877
|
People v. Cluff
Order |
|
Jun. 29, 2001 | ||
S097054
|
Hashem H., a Minor
Order |
|
Jun. 29, 2001 | ||
S097579
|
People v. Fonseca
Order |
|
Jun. 29, 2001 | ||
00-768
|
INS v. Nguyen
Order |
|
Jun. 29, 2001 | ||
00-268
|
Zalawadia v. Ashcroft
Order |
|
Jun. 29, 2001 | ||
00-285
|
McQueen v. SC Dept. of Health
Order |
|
Jun. 29, 2001 | ||
00-6280
|
Max-George v. Ashcroft
Order |
|
Jun. 29, 2001 |