This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Breedlove v. Gibson
Order
Prisoners Rights May 23, 2001
U.S. v. Black
Order
Criminal Law and Procedure May 23, 2001
Greasham v. Booher
Order
Prisoners Rights May 23, 2001
Pricer v. State of New Mexico
Order
Employment Law May 23, 2001
Isham v. Wilcox
Order
Employment Law May 23, 2001
Pounds v. Department of Interior
Order
Civil Procedure May 23, 2001
Wilkins v. Colorado Department of Social Services Division of Vacational Rehabilitation
Order
Civil Procedure May 23, 2001
Carmel Valley Fire Protection v. State of California
Order
May 23, 2001
State v. Cronin
Criminal accomplice must have intended to help commit the specific offense charged, not 'any' crime.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 22, 2001
Manduley v. Superior Court (San Diego County)
Order
May 22, 2001
Washington v. Nolan
Court may require convicted criminal to pay State's costs for appellate review.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 22, 2001
State v. Fulps
Defendant's right to speedy trial under state law is violated when trial is scheduled nine months after release from bail.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 22, 2001
Griffin v. West RS Inc.
Once jury finds defendant is negligent, whatever standard of duty defendant has doesn't affect jury's proximate cause determination.
Torts May 22, 2001
Moore v. Whitman County
County must meet population requirements or choose compliance with Growth Management Act to come under jurisdiction of hearings board.
Civil Procedure May 22, 2001
Winbun v. Moore
Among other things, statute of limitations one year discovery period begins when plaintiff discovers act or omission that caused injury.
Torts May 22, 2001
State v. Sullivan
Pseudo-legal documents do not qualify as judicial process for purpose of prosecuting defendant under barratry statute.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 22, 2001
Haywood v. Aranda
Plaintiffs cannot object to defendants' failure to file proof of service of request for trial after trial has taken place.
Civil Procedure May 22, 2001
Personal Restraint of Perkins
Court of Appeals had authority to transfer second personal restraint petition to state supreme court.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 22, 2001
Coscia v. Brooks
Order
May 22, 2001
Winter v. DC Comics
Order
May 21, 2001
Styne v. Stevens
Order
May 21, 2001
State v. Chapman
Court errs in reversing accused conviction for violation of 'no-contact order.'
Criminal Law and Procedure May 21, 2001
United International Holdings v. The Wharf (Holdings) Limited
Substantial and non-frivolous federal claims permits court to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over related state claims.
Civil Procedure May 21, 2001
King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board
County may not amend zoning laws to allow athletic fields on designated agricultural lands.
Government May 21, 2001
Kucera v. State of Washington
Court may not issue injunction limiting speed of passenger ferry without first finding that claimants had inadequate remedy at law.
Civil Procedure May 21, 2001
Griswold v. Doner-Griswold
Order
May 21, 2001
In re Greening
Petition against unlawful sentence filed more than one year after sentencing is not time barred if there is significant change in law.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 21, 2001
Broad v. Mannesmann Anlagenbau Ag
Service of process upon foreign party need not occur within 90 day statute of limitations if document is transmitted to central authority.
Civil Procedure May 21, 2001
Hallauer v. Spectrum Properties Inc.
Party showing both benefical use, falling within defintion of pubic use, and necessity are entitled to proceed with condemnation action.
Real Property May 21, 2001
State v. Twyman
Jury selection that only includes three zip codes of county is constitutional so long as resultant jury is fair and impartial.
Criminal Law and Procedure May 21, 2001