Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
00-550
|
Steyskal v. United States
Order |
|
Jan. 15, 2001 | ||
00-5296
|
Dore v. United States
Order |
|
Jan. 15, 2001 | ||
00-6571
|
Phillips v. United States
Order |
|
Jan. 15, 2001 | ||
99-51
|
Gutierrez v. ADA
Statute governing Guam's elections for governor and lieutenant governor doesn't require runoff election when candidate slate receives majority votes. |
Government |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
95-30158
|
U.S. v. Ramirez
Police cannot ignore knock and announce rule in executing warrant when no exigent circumstances exist. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
95-56447
|
L'Anza Research International Inc. v. Quality King Distributors Inc.
First sale doctrine doesn't bar claim involving exportation and later importation of copyrighted goods. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
94-55816 and 94-55894
|
Columbia Pictures Television v. Krypton Broadcasting of Birmingham Inc.
Separate damages awards are justified for distinct infringements by each TV episode shown on different stations. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
94-36116
|
Central Office Telephone Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co.
Filed-tariff doctrine is inapplicable to communications common carrier and reseller's contract for billing services. |
Contracts |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
95-35560
|
Forney v. Chater
Social security disability claimant, after winning remand in district court, is not entitled to appeal. |
Government |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
00-1148
|
U.S. v. Rojas-Mendoza
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
00-2048
|
U.S. v. Lahi
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
00-7021
|
Chester v. Apfel
Order |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
99-1397
|
U.S. v. Bustillos-Munoz
Drugs found in car during traffic stop are admissible because officer had reasonable belief that traffic violation occurred. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
99-2247
|
Creative Gifts v. UFO, Michael Sherlock
Court properly concludes that the term "Levitron" is not generic and thus may be enforced as a trademark. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
99-6352
|
Dodoo v. Seagate Technology
Employer willfully violated Age Discrimination in Employment Act and discriminated against qualified black employee where he was denied promotions for several positions |
Employment Law |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
99-6209
|
U.S. v. Keeling
Accused's five-year supervised release term is improper. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
99-6188
|
Fent v. Oklahoma Water Resources Board
Federal government is immune from lawsuit but claim against state government must be returned to state court. |
Government |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
99-2337
|
U.S. v. Kelly
Courts should not treat prisoner motions as Section 2255 motions unless movant agrees to recharacterization or is given opportunity to withdraw motion. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
99-8009
|
Borgialli v. Thunder Basin Coal Co.
Employee who poses safety risk does not establish prima facie case under American With Disabilities Act. |
Employment Law |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
00-3134
|
Smith v. State of Kansas
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
00-3125
|
U.S. v. Al-Bataineh
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
00-5001
|
McMahon v. U.S.
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
00-3122
|
U.S. v. Smith
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
00-8095
|
U.S. v. Friday
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
99-6429
|
U.S. v. Dorris
Commerce Clause provides state authority to regulate felon's possession of firearm and Armed Career Criminal Act allows enhancement of sentence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
00-1069
|
Nixon v. Honaker
Failure to receive notice of right to proceed does not meet exceptional circumstances test for court to overturn motion under Rule 60(b). |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
99-5094
|
U.S. v. Maynard
Prosecutorial misconduct will not result in mistrial unless misconduct influences jury verdict and denies defendant right to fair trial. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
00-3108
|
Lowe v. Angelo's Italian Foods Inc.
Order |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
00-3353
|
Williams v. Rohling
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 | |
00-1465
|
In re Kozeny
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jan. 12, 2001 |