Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
99-6226
|
Hodges v. Addison
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 | |
99-3185 and 99-3190
|
U.S. v. West
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 | |
99-6268
|
US v. Holbrook
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 | |
99-7104
|
Lowe v. Apfel
Order |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 | |
99-3334
|
U.S. v. Maldonado
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 | |
99-1174
|
Houston v. Norton
Attorney fees can be assessed against a pro se plaintiff in a 1983 civil rights action but the court must articulate its reasons. |
Attorneys |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 | |
99-1149
|
McLaughlin v. Board of Trustees of State Colleges of Colorado
Removal of action to federal court by state is effective waiver to Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity. |
Employment Law |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 | |
98-4136
|
Diaz v. Farley
Agreement with hospital for doctor to be exclusive provider of anesthesiology services does not warrant per se analysis under Sherman Act. |
Antitrust |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 | |
99-2226
|
U.S. v. Jaramillo-Garcia
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 | |
99-5164
|
Miller v. Klingler
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 | |
00-1060
|
Campbell v. Mart
Order |
Civil Rights |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 | |
99-1361
|
Anderson v. Dillon Co.
Order |
Civil Rights |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 | |
99-6303
|
Hicks v. Woodruff
Order |
Civil Rights |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 | |
99-3173
|
Scott v. Kennedy
Order |
Constitutional Law |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 | |
00SA85
|
People v. Randolph
Seized evidence properly suppressed when warrant facially deficient because supporting affidavit lacked sufficient particularity about alleged criminal activity. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 | |
99SC223
|
Benz v. People
Sentencing court can conduct administrative review process when the community corrections board or program does not. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 | |
99SA317
|
People v. McCullough
Parole officers need not have reasonable grounds to perform a parole search. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 | |
00SA148
|
Percy v. Embury
'Colorado Natural Lands and Open Space Conservation' initiative has sufficiently clear and correct title and does not violate the one subject rule. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 | |
99-8059
|
Gunderson v. Uphoff
Order |
Civil Rights |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 | |
99-401
|
California Democratic Party v. Jones
California's blanket primary violates political party's First Amendment right of association. |
Government |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 | |
99-5525
|
Dickerson v. United States
Miranda created a constitutional rule that the U.S. Congress cannot legislatively supersede. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 | |
99-244
|
Mobil Oil Exploration & Producing Southeast Inc. v. United States
Party contracting with the government is entitled to restitution if the government substantially breaches contract or communicates intent to do so. |
Contracts |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 | |
99-478
|
Apprendi v. New Jersey
Fact that increases sentencing beyond prescribed maximum other than prior conviction must be proved beyond reasonable doubt to jury. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 | |
98-1161
|
Erie, PA v. PAP'S A.M.
Certiorari granted |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 | ||
S071649
|
Till v. Ablestik Laboratories
Order |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 | ||
99-62
|
Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe
Student-initiated, student-delivered invocations and benedictions at high school graduations are constitutional, but only if students are instructed to keep their messages nosectarian and nonproselytizing. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 | |
99-244 & 99-253
|
Mobil Oil Exploration v. United States
Passage of federal legislation effectively delaying regulatory approval of exploration operations is not material breach of federal offshore oil and gas lease. |
Contracts |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 | |
99-312
|
Norfolk Southern Rwy v. Shanklin
Order |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 | ||
99-409
|
Hartford Underwriters Ins. v. Magna Bank
Certiorari granted |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 | ||
99-536
|
Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products
Once employer presents legitimate, nondiscriminatory basis for firing, employee must then present sufficient evidence that firing was due to age. |
Employment Law |
|
Jul. 5, 2000 |