Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S084475
|
Wilson v. Superior Court (Watson)
Order |
|
Jun. 26, 2000 | ||
B131626
|
People v. Callejas
Ex post facto law is not violated by imposing parole revocation fine on parolee who committed underlying crime before fine was enacted. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 26, 2000 | |
99-474
|
Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council
Supremacy Clause pre-empts state law that bars state entities from doing business with Burma. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Jun. 26, 2000 | |
99-224
|
Miller v. French
Separation of powers doctrine not violated even though court can enjoin automatic-stay provisions of Prison Litigation Reform Act. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Jun. 26, 2000 | |
99-62
|
Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe
Policy permitting student-initiated, student-led prayer at football games violates Establishment Clause. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Jun. 26, 2000 | |
S079107
|
Swinney v. Chevron Chemical Co.
Order |
|
Jun. 26, 2000 | ||
S075141
|
Shahhal v. Medical Board of California
Order |
|
Jun. 26, 2000 | ||
S087397
|
People v. Callejas
Order |
|
Jun. 26, 2000 | ||
99-935
|
Chandler v. Siegelman
Order |
|
Jun. 26, 2000 | ||
S083149
|
Lockyer v. Medical Board of California
Order |
|
Jun. 26, 2000 | ||
99-1264
|
Brown v. O'Dea
Order |
|
Jun. 26, 2000 | ||
S072172
|
Shahhal v. Superior Court (Medical Board of California)
Review granted |
|
Jun. 25, 2000 | ||
97-35836
|
Meade v. Cedarapids Inc.
Withholding plant-closure plan from prospective employees while claiming company growth is false representation. |
Labor Law |
|
Jun. 23, 2000 | |
97-30383
|
U.S. v. Neill
Pepper spray qualifies as a 'dangerous weapon' under federal Sentencing Guidelines. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 23, 2000 | |
98-35854
|
Addisu v. Fred Meyer Inc.
Refusal of retailer to contract with consumer who intends on reselling name-brand product isn't a violation of the consumer's civil rights. |
Civil Rights |
|
Jun. 23, 2000 | |
97-30383
|
U.S. v. Neill
Under federal Sentencing Guidelines, pepper spray constitutes a dangerous weapon. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 23, 2000 | |
97-35863
|
Tidwell v. Apfel
Medical charts alone aren't enough to establish that applicant seeking benefits is unable to work. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jun. 23, 2000 | |
97-36198 and 98-35013
|
Taylor v. Reno
State has jurisdiction to arrest defendant released on own recognizance while awaiting sentencing by federal court. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 23, 2000 | |
98-30051
|
United States v. Lopez
Defendant's refusal to disclose illegal drug source bars application of 'safety valve' under federal Sentencing Guidelines. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 23, 2000 | |
97-71359
|
Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Under the Internal Revenue Code, fair market value of appreciated assets can be determined by hypothetical sale. |
Taxation |
|
Jun. 23, 2000 | |
97-35863
|
Tidwell v. Apfel
Medical charts alone aren't enough to establish that applicant seeking benefits is unable to work. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jun. 23, 2000 | |
S087986
|
Shade Foods Inc. v. Innovative Products Sale & Marketing Inc.
Order |
|
Jun. 23, 2000 | ||
S087982
|
Luisa Z., a Minor
Order |
|
Jun. 23, 2000 | ||
S087996
|
Centex Golden Construction Co. v. Dale Title Co.
Order |
|
Jun. 23, 2000 | ||
S087680
|
Boicourt v. AMEX Assurance Co.
Order |
|
Jun. 23, 2000 | ||
S087628
|
People v. Superior Court (Mouchaourab)
Order |
|
Jun. 23, 2000 | ||
E024743
|
Finley v. Third Laguna Hills Mutual
Plaintiffs not entitled to summary adjudication when defendants' activities are neither ultra vires nor illegal. |
Corporations |
|
Jun. 23, 2000 | |
S072172
|
Shahhal v. Superior Court (Medical Board of California)
Order |
|
Jun. 23, 2000 | ||
S080060
|
Sheridan on Habeas Corpus
Order |
|
Jun. 23, 2000 | ||
98-35659
|
Mitchell v. Burt Vetterlein & Bushnell P.C. (In re Alexander V. Stein)
180 days is outer time limit for party who doesn't receive notice of entry of judgment to seek additional time to appeal. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 23, 2000 |