This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Wilson v. Superior Court (Watson)
Order
Jun. 26, 2000
People v. Callejas
Ex post facto law is not violated by imposing parole revocation fine on parolee who committed underlying crime before fine was enacted.
Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 26, 2000
Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council
Supremacy Clause pre-empts state law that bars state entities from doing business with Burma.
Constitutional Law Jun. 26, 2000
Miller v. French
Separation of powers doctrine not violated even though court can enjoin automatic-stay provisions of Prison Litigation Reform Act.
Constitutional Law Jun. 26, 2000
Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe
Policy permitting student-initiated, student-led prayer at football games violates Establishment Clause.
Constitutional Law Jun. 26, 2000
Swinney v. Chevron Chemical Co.
Order
Jun. 26, 2000
Shahhal v. Medical Board of California
Order
Jun. 26, 2000
People v. Callejas
Order
Jun. 26, 2000
Chandler v. Siegelman
Order
Jun. 26, 2000
Lockyer v. Medical Board of California
Order
Jun. 26, 2000
Brown v. O'Dea
Order
Jun. 26, 2000
Shahhal v. Superior Court (Medical Board of California)
Review granted
Jun. 25, 2000
Meade v. Cedarapids Inc.
Withholding plant-closure plan from prospective employees while claiming company growth is false representation.
Labor Law Jun. 23, 2000
U.S. v. Neill
Pepper spray qualifies as a 'dangerous weapon' under federal Sentencing Guidelines.
Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 23, 2000
Addisu v. Fred Meyer Inc.
Refusal of retailer to contract with consumer who intends on reselling name-brand product isn't a violation of the consumer's civil rights.
Civil Rights Jun. 23, 2000
U.S. v. Neill
Under federal Sentencing Guidelines, pepper spray constitutes a dangerous weapon.
Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 23, 2000
Tidwell v. Apfel
Medical charts alone aren't enough to establish that applicant seeking benefits is unable to work.
Administrative Agencies Jun. 23, 2000
Taylor v. Reno
State has jurisdiction to arrest defendant released on own recognizance while awaiting sentencing by federal court.
Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 23, 2000
United States v. Lopez
Defendant's refusal to disclose illegal drug source bars application of 'safety valve' under federal Sentencing Guidelines.
Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 23, 2000
Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Under the Internal Revenue Code, fair market value of appreciated assets can be determined by hypothetical sale.
Taxation Jun. 23, 2000
Tidwell v. Apfel
Medical charts alone aren't enough to establish that applicant seeking benefits is unable to work.
Administrative Agencies Jun. 23, 2000
Shade Foods Inc. v. Innovative Products Sale & Marketing Inc.
Order
Jun. 23, 2000
Luisa Z., a Minor
Order
Jun. 23, 2000
Centex Golden Construction Co. v. Dale Title Co.
Order
Jun. 23, 2000
Boicourt v. AMEX Assurance Co.
Order
Jun. 23, 2000
People v. Superior Court (Mouchaourab)
Order
Jun. 23, 2000
Finley v. Third Laguna Hills Mutual
Plaintiffs not entitled to summary adjudication when defendants' activities are neither ultra vires nor illegal.
Corporations Jun. 23, 2000
Shahhal v. Superior Court (Medical Board of California)
Order
Jun. 23, 2000
Sheridan on Habeas Corpus
Order
Jun. 23, 2000
Mitchell v. Burt Vetterlein & Bushnell P.C. (In re Alexander V. Stein)
180 days is outer time limit for party who doesn't receive notice of entry of judgment to seek additional time to appeal.
Civil Procedure Jun. 23, 2000