Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
99-579
|
Harris Trust and Savings Bank v. Salomon Smith Barney Inc.
Civil actions to redress ERISA Title I violations are not limited to fiduciary defendants. |
Contracts |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 | |
99-10352
|
U.S. v. Hicks
Creating false tax returns is sufficient evidence to support conviction for making false statement to federally insured financial institution. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 | |
98-0703
|
Haisch v. Allstate Insurance Co.
Insurer did not engage in fraudulent misrepresentation in marketing Med Pay coverage. |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 | |
98-0233
|
Ahwatukee Custom Estates Management Association Inc. v. Turner
Trial court properly denies corrective relief when complainant has acted arbitrarily and unreasonably. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 | |
00-0109
|
Holt v. Hotham
Accused may be held in civil contempt for refusing to submit to court-ordered psychosexual evaluation. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 | |
99-2145
|
U.S. v. Benally
District court improperly grants downward offense-level departure on grounds that accused's behavior was aberrant. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 | |
99-6157
|
S.E.C. v. Cochran
Evidence creates genuine issue of material fact about whether bond underwriter's employee has fiduciary relationship with a government agency. |
Securities |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 | |
99-1383
|
Beierle v. Zavares
Order |
Civil Rights |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 | |
98-4147
|
U.S. v. Donneville Distributing
Order |
Contracts |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 | |
00-3070
|
Shaw v. McKune
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 | |
99-3346
|
U.S. v. Underwood
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 | |
99-6009
|
U.S. v. Orange
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 | |
99-3221
|
Hickles v. McKune
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 | |
99-1125
|
Colorado Farm Bureau Federation v. United States Forest Service
Order |
Environmental Law |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 | |
99-3311
|
Curry v. U.S. Disciplinary Barracks
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 | |
99-7103
|
Easterwood v. Champion
Statute of limitations for habeas corpus petition based on new evidence does not begin until date new evidence could have been discovered. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 | |
99-1143
|
Goebel v. Denver & Rio Grand Western Railroad Co.
District court, when faced with objection to expert testimony, must demonstrate by specific findings on record that it performed its duty as gatekeeper. |
Torts |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 | |
99-7019
|
U.S. v. Cherry
Co-conspirators waive confrontation and hearsay objections as a result of reasonably foreseeable actions in furtherance of an ongoing conspiracy. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 | |
99-1089
|
U.S. v. Akers
Court does not abuse discretion by denying right to self-representation when motive is to delay trial. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 | |
98-6395
|
Barr v. Runyon
Order |
Employment Law |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 | |
99-1010 and 99-1130
|
Manning v. McGraw-Hill Inc.
Order |
Employment Law |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 | |
99-6275
|
Nelson v. ITT Hartford Fire Insurance Co.
Order |
Insurance |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 | |
00-7013
|
Wilkins v. Fries
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 | |
00-3118
|
Lambros v. Booker
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 | |
99-3274
|
U.S. v. McClatchey
Post-conviction motion for acquittal cannot be granted when reasonable basis exists for jury verdict. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 | |
98-1430
|
Romero v. Furlong
Breakdown in communication between attorney and client resulting from client's unjustifiable reaction to his situation does not receive Sixth Amendment protection. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 | |
99-6217
|
Canadian County Water Authority v. City of Union
Order |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 | |
00-1129
|
Merritt v. Pugh
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 | |
99-4163
|
U.S. v. Juarez-Rodriguez
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 | |
99-6127
|
Barker v. City of Del City
Courts must use balancing test to determine First Amendment violations when speech at issue does not implicate employee's politics or substantive policy viewpoints. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Jun. 21, 2000 |