Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S072002
|
Chen v. Franchise Tax Board
Taxpayer needn't pay interest before seeking judicial review of claim for refund of corporate franchise taxes. |
Taxation |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
99-2136
|
U.S. v. Maldonaldo-Acosta
Court may not reduce defendant's sentence without motion from government seeking reduction. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
99-4070
|
Lighton v. University of Utah
Employee does not have property interest in job stemming from at will employment contract compounded with his voluntary resignation. |
Employment Law |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
99-4107
|
Cruz v. Webb
Order |
Civil Rights |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
98-674
|
In re Indefinite Detention Cases
INS detention requires court to balance likelihood of deportation against alien's danger to community and likelihood of flight. |
Immigration |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
00-0005
|
Rita J v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
Dependency order removing children from custody of mother if done in their best interest is not appealable. |
Family Law |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
97-0520
|
Parada v. Parada
Modification of dissolution decree incorporating assignment of new spouse's share of retirment and death benefits to ex-spouse is statutorily prohibited. |
Family Law |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
98-0587
|
Logerquist v. McVey
Court errs in conducting hearing on admissibility of expert testimony regarding repressed memory. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
99-0105
|
State v. Marshall
Criminal statute protecting children from sexual exploitation includes conduct by defendant compelling an act of self-masturbation by child. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
99-1415
|
U.S. v. Arevalo-Tavares
Defendant waives right to appeal deportation order where he fails to timely appeal after being notified to do so. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
99-2006
|
U.S. v. Mackovich
Court did not commit judicial error finding defendant diagnosed with mental disorder competent to stand trial. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
99-2165
|
U.S. v. Hudson
Routine border stop at fixed checkpoint is not custodial and therefore does not require Miranda warnings. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
99-4104
|
State of Utah v. U.S. Department of the Interior
State may not intervene in lease approval process between Indian tribe and private party without showing 'immediate injury.' |
Constitutional Law |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
99-0010
|
Davis v. Arizona Department of Revenue
Arizona law allows tax credit only if taxes paid to another state are imposed on and paid by same taxpayer. |
Taxation |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
99-1393
|
Greene v. Safeway Stores, Inc.
Order |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
99-1370
|
Spangle v. Warden Holt
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
99-6213
|
Hudson v. Norick
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
99-6167
|
Norris v. Apfel
Order |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
99-1262
|
Alexander v. U.S. parole Commission
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
99-1451
|
U.S. v. Williams
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
99-6432
|
Spells v. Kaiser
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
99-7153
|
Atkins v. Boone
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
00-6003
|
Clark v. Fleming
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
98-8096
|
State of Wyoming v. Federated Service Insurance
Order |
Insurance |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
98-7148
|
Pittsburg County Rural Water District No. 7 v. City of Mcalester
Order |
Government |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
98-3248
|
Joshua W. v. USD 259 Board of Education
Order |
Education |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
00-6004
|
Bell v. U.S. Postal Service
Order |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
99-6424
|
Cathcart v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
99-5052
|
U.S. v. Custer
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2000 | |
A076543
|
People v. Woods
Officer cannot enter residence to determine whether individual is violating probation, regardless of officer's subjective intent. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 8, 2000 |