For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Free v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
Order 		Prisoners Rights May 2, 2000
Weiner v. San Diego County
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 2, 2000
McElhiney v. Booker
Order 		Prisoners Rights May 2, 2000
U.S. v. Madrigal
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 2, 2000
U.S. v. Hernandez
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 2, 2000
In re the Matter of Cimino
Thirty-day suspension is adequate for lawyer who entered into prohibited business transaction with corporation, while simultaneously representing corporation. 		Attorneys May 2, 2000
Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Shanklin
Federal Railroad Safety Act preempts state tort claims when federal funds are used to install crossing safety devices. 		Government May 2, 2000
Bond v. U.S.
Law enforcement officer's physical manipulation of bus passenger's carry-on luggage violates Fourth Amendment's proscription against unreasonable searches. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 2, 2000
Salcedo v. People
Expert testimony that defendant conformed to drug courier profile is not admissible as substantive evidence of his guilt. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 2, 2000
Williams v. Taylor
Defendant's failure to develop claim's factual basis in state court despite diligence will not bar federal evidentiary hearing. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 2, 2000
Williams v. Taylor
Defendant's death sentence must be reversed where his counsel failed to introduce mitigating evidence at sentencing hearing. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 2, 2000
Edwards v. Carpenter
Ineffective assistance claim can serve as cause to excuse default of another habeas claim only if petitioner satisfies cause and prejudice standard. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 2, 2000
Nelson v. Adams USA Inc.
Due process requires amended party be given opportunity to respond and contest personal liability before judgment is entered against him. 		Civil Procedure May 2, 2000
U.S. v. Ruiz-Alvarez
When one conviction is reversed and others affirmed on appeal, trial court may resentence defendant without remand language from appeals court. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 2, 2000
Drake Oil Technology v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Order 		Taxation May 2, 2000
Dilliner v. Apfel
Order 		Insurance May 2, 2000
Nauert v. Nava Leisure USA Inc.
Order 		Immigration May 2, 2000
Montano v. Allstate Indemnity
Order 		Insurance May 2, 2000
Burkholz v. Joyce
Order 		Civil Procedure May 2, 2000
Ameriks v. Zions First National Bank
Order 		Civil Procedure May 2, 2000
U.S. v. Vaughn
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 2, 2000
Melissa K., a Minor
Court must advise juvenile of her rights when she voluntarily admits violating probation. 		Juveniles May 2, 2000
Shoaf v. Apfel
Order 		Insurance May 2, 2000
Lopez v. Govitz
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 2, 2000
Haugh v. Warden Booker
Transfer of proceeding to cure jurisdictional defect is unnecessary where 'peek at merits' reveals that defendant's claims are meritless. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 2, 2000
McGuire v. Continental Airlines Inc.
Employer's grievance procedure is sole remedy available to employee challenging disciplinary action. 		Employment Law May 2, 2000
U.S. v. Contreras
District court properly orders defendant's federal sentence to run consecutively with state sentence. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 2, 2000
U.S. v. Davis
Order 		Contracts May 2, 2000
Steffens v. Steffens
Order 		Civil Procedure May 2, 2000
Juda v. Nerney
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 2, 2000
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.