For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
People v. Panozo
Penal Code Sections 1170.9 and 1170.91 obligate court to consider defendant's service-related mental health issues, including posttraumatic stress disorder, as mitigating factor in granting probation. 		statutory_interpretation 4DCA/1 Jan. 12, 2021
People v. Laanui
Pleading and proof of prior strike allegation is sufficient to subject defendant to Three Strikes sentencing on all eligible offenses, without alleging strike on count-by-count basis. 		statutory_interpretation 2DCA/1 Jan. 12, 2021
City of Norco v. Mugar
City's use of outside counsel on fixed hourly rate regardless of outcome, did not violate defendant's due process rights. 		Constitutional Law 4DCA/2 Jan. 12, 2021
Filosa v. Alagappan
Summary judgment based on statute of limitations was reversed because there was triable issue of fact as to date of plaintiff's injury and his discovery of injury. 		Torts 1DCA/4 Jan. 12, 2021
Americans for Prosperity v. Becerra
Order 		USSC Jan. 12, 2021
Thomas More Law Center v. Becerra
Order 		USSC Jan. 12, 2021
Greer v. U.S.
Order 		USSC Jan. 12, 2021
Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.
Order 		USSC Jan. 12, 2021
Sanchez v. Wolf
Order 		USSC Jan. 12, 2021
San Antonio, Texas v. Hotels.com
Order 		USSC Jan. 12, 2021
Guam v. U.S.
Order 		USSC Jan. 12, 2021
U.S. v. Palomar-Santiago
Order 		USSC Jan. 12, 2021
Minerva Surgical Inc. v. Hologic Inc.
Order 		USSC Jan. 12, 2021
U.S. v. Gary
Order 		USSC Jan. 12, 2021
Hollyfrontier Cheyenne v. Renewable Fuels Assn.
Order 		USSC Jan. 12, 2021
Mnuchin v. Confederated Tribes
Order 		USSC Jan. 12, 2021
AK Native Village Corp. v. Confederated Tribes
Order 		USSC Jan. 12, 2021
Terry v. U.S.
Order 		USSC Jan. 12, 2021
Immigration and Customs v. Padilla
Order 		USSC Jan. 12, 2021
Olan v. U.S.
Order 		USSC Jan. 12, 2021
Blaszczak v. U.S.
Order 		USSC Jan. 12, 2021
Hayes v. Lousiana
Order 		USSC Jan. 12, 2021
Jones v. Lousiana
Order 		USSC Jan. 12, 2021
Bruni v. City of Pittsburgh
Order 		USSC Jan. 12, 2021
Hussain v. Rosen
Substantial evidence supported Board of Immigration Appeals' finding that petitioner failed to meet his burden of proof for asylum because petitioner was not a victim of persecution. 		Immigration 9th Jan. 12, 2021
People v. Brand
Defendant's condition of mandatory supervision specifying that defendant must report arrests or contacts with law enforcement was not unconstitutionally vague or overbroad. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 4DCA/1 Jan. 12, 2021
Nagel v. Westen
Trial court erred in dismissing plaintiff's cause of action for fraudulent transfer under Uniform Voidable Transactions Act. 		Real Property 2DCA/6 Jan. 11, 2021
Lee v. Kotyluk
Landlords may rely on three-day notice served by their predecessor in interest as grounds for unlawful detainer claim. 		Civil Procedure 4DCA/3 Jan. 11, 2021
Antelope Valley Groundwater Cases
Expert testimony provided substantial support for trial court's conclusion that parties' stipulated plan would restore basin to hydrological balance. 		Water Rights 5DCA Jan. 11, 2021
Modification: 11 Lagunita, LLC v. California Coastal Commission
There was no abuse of discretion in California Coastal Commission's $1 million administrative penalty against plaintiffs for violating Coastal Development Permit. 		Administrative Agencies 4DCA/3 Jan. 11, 2021
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.