For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Henness v. DeWine
Order 		USSC Oct. 9, 2020
Kaur v. Maryland
Order 		USSC Oct. 9, 2020
Davis v. Ermold
Order 		USSC Oct. 9, 2020
Andino v. Middleton
Order 		USSC Oct. 9, 2020
Dones v. Life Insurance Co. of North America
Trial court erred in sustaining insurance company's demurrer because plaintiff's allegations that insurance company waived precondition to coverage were sufficient to withstand demurrer. 		Insurance 1DCA/2 Oct. 9, 2020
In re Butler
Petitioner's due process right to timely trial had been violated and public defender, district attorney, and trial court all bore some responsibility for 13-year delay. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 1DCA/1 Oct. 9, 2020
Gruber v. Yelp Inc.
Penal Code Sections 632 and 637.2 are primarily intended to protect the privacy of the communications of California residents, and therefore, apply to all recordings of such communications--whether one-sided or two-sided. 		Civil Procedure 1DCA/3 Oct. 9, 2020
State of California v. Little Sisters of the Poor
Order 		9th Oct. 9, 2020
In re BofI Holding Inc. Securities Litigation
Corrective disclosures to prove loss causation in a private securities fraud action can come from any source, including knowledgeable third parties such as whistleblowers. 		Securities 9th Oct. 9, 2020
County of Sonoma v. U.S. Bank N.A.
Trial court was authorized under Health and Safety Code Section 17980.7 and Code of Civil Procedure Section 564 to issue receiver's certificate, secured by super-priority lien, to ameliorate nuisance conditions on property. 		Real Property 1DCA/1 Oct. 9, 2020
In re Dominic F.
Substantial evidence supported the juvenile court's finding that the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 did not apply to minors. 		Dependency 2DCA/8 Oct. 8, 2020
Stevenson v. City of Sacramento
Trial court properly ordered appellants to post an undertaking under Code of Civil Procedure Section 529 as a condition to obtaining their Public Records Act injunction. 		Public Records Act 3DCA Oct. 8, 2020
In re Rudolf Sienega
Bankruptcy court correctly found notifying California Franchise Tax Board of federal tax adjustments via fax did not constitute 'informal returns' under Bankruptcy Code Section 523(a)(1)(B). 		Bankruptcy BAP Oct. 8, 2020
In re Dennis Berkovich and Marina Voloshin
Report required under Revenue and Taxation Code Section 18622(a) is an 'equivalent report' within the meaning of Bankruptcy Code Section 523(a)(1)(B). 		Bankruptcy BAP Oct. 8, 2020
Fipke v. California Horse Racing Bd.
Business and Professions Code Section 19500 prohibits stewards from awarding double jockey fee to rider who is removed from mount prior to 'scratch time.' 		statutory_interpretation 2DCA/8 Oct. 7, 2020
Skaff v. Rio Nido Roadhouse
Plaintiff could not be awarded attorney fees under catalyst theory because claim on which it was based was objectively without legal merit. 		Civil Procedure 1DCA/1 Oct. 7, 2020
Shipp v. Western Engineering, Inc.
Highway contractor controlling traffic on public highway owed duty of care to motorist who was rear-ended when forced to stop behind vehicle that was unable to turn left because contractor stopped traffic. 		Torts 3DCA Oct. 7, 2020
Reales Investment, LLC v. Johnson
Trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion for continuance made on the first day of trial. 		Civil Procedure 4DCA/2 Oct. 7, 2020
Modification: Murray v. UPS Capital Insurance Agency, Inc.
Plaintiff raised triable issue of fact as to whether defendant undertook special duty by holding itself out as having expertise in inland marine insurance. 		Torts 4DCA/3 Oct. 7, 2020
Arizona Democratic Party v. Hobbs
Order 		9th Oct. 7, 2020
U.S. v. Pacheco
Deportation is 'pending' for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 2246(5)(A) when victims are in unresolved deportation or removal proceedings; thus, defendant's convictions for sexually abusing noncitizen minors were affirmed. 		statutory_interpretation 9th Oct. 7, 2020
Doe v. Yim
Trial court did not abuse its discretion in disqualifying attorney from representing her daughter against attorney's ex-husband for alleged sexual abuse under advocate-witness rule. 		Attorneys 2DCA/4 Oct. 7, 2020
People v. Allison
Defendant convicted of murder with felony-murder special circumstance was properly held ineligible for resentencing under Penal Code Section 1170.95. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 2DCA/1 Oct. 6, 2020
People v. Martinez
Sufficient evidence supported jury's finding that defendant solicited or recruited minor to actively participate in a criminal street gang under Penal Code Section 186.26(a). 		Criminal Law and Procedure 3DCA Oct. 6, 2020
Flagship Theatres of Palm Desert, LLC v. Century Theatres, Inc.
Plaintiff did not present substantial evidence of anticompetitive effects in the relevant geographic market. 		Antitrust 2DCA/1 Oct. 6, 2020
In re S.S.
Juvenile court's detriment finding was based on father's poverty, which is barred by statute and case law. 		Dependency 4DCA/2 Oct. 6, 2020
Flores v. Barr
Opinion 		9th Oct. 6, 2020
U.S. v. Sterling Centrecorp
Operator liability under CERCLA requires the actual participation in decisions related to pollution. 		statutory_interpretation 9th Oct. 6, 2020
Hooked Media Group, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
Broken promises regarding future conduct may be actionable as promissory fraud, but only if promisor did not actually intend to perform at the time the promise was made. 		Civil Procedure 6DCA Oct. 5, 2020
Simgel Co., Inc. v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
A trial court has the authority to correct a mistaken verdict under Code of Civil Procedure Section 663. 		Civil Procedure 2DCA/8 Oct. 5, 2020
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.