Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
98-6056
|
Mardis v. Central National Bank & Trust of Enid
Order |
Labor Law |
|
Apr. 15, 1999 | |
97-0476
|
In re Hall v. Lalli
Paternity suit brought by child isn't barred by prior paternity suit brought on behalf of child's mother, which resulted in a contrary judgment. |
Family Law |
|
Apr. 15, 1999 | |
S076880
|
Acceptance Insurance Co. v. Syufy Enterprises
Order |
|
Apr. 15, 1999 | ||
S057197
|
Adoption Petition of Mark and Stacy A.
Order |
|
Apr. 15, 1999 | ||
S076498
|
Richard C., a minor
Order |
|
Apr. 15, 1999 | ||
S076453
|
People ex rel State Air Resources Board v. Wilmshurst
Order |
|
Apr. 15, 1999 | ||
S076346
|
In re Christina B.
Order |
|
Apr. 15, 1999 | ||
S077269
|
Morrison Krudsen Corp. v. Hancock Rothert and Bunshoft LLP Et Al.
Order |
|
Apr. 15, 1999 | ||
98-6233
|
Premier Private Security Inc. v. International Union
Order |
Labor Law |
|
Apr. 15, 1999 | |
S076686
|
General Motors Corporation v. City and County of San Francisco
Order |
|
Apr. 15, 1999 | ||
S076576
|
Scheiding v. Dinwiddie Construction Co.
Order |
|
Apr. 15, 1999 | ||
S076956
|
National Union Fire Insurance Company Of v. Nationwide Insurance Company
Order |
|
Apr. 15, 1999 | ||
98-1104
|
Pacheco v. Ward
Order |
Civil Rights |
|
Apr. 15, 1999 | |
98-1395
|
U.S. v. Al-Amin
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 15, 1999 | |
98-2315
|
Abell v. Babbitt
Order |
Employment Law |
|
Apr. 15, 1999 | |
98-3077
|
U.S. v. Carey
Officers with warrant to search computer files for drug-related materials can't open files they suspect may contain pornography. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Apr. 15, 1999 | |
98-7043
|
Bear v. Boone
State court remedies are exhausted once highest court has decided the same claims made in federal habeas petition. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 15, 1999 | |
98-5077
|
McNamar v. Apfel
Exclusion of health insurance premium isn't required by statute when reducing amount of social security disability benefits by civil service disability benefits. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Apr. 15, 1999 | |
98-2127
|
U.S. v. Willinger
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 15, 1999 | |
97-0431
|
Webb v. The State of Arizona
Insufficiently detailed request for administrative rehearing constitutes a denial of the rehearing 'on the merits.' |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Apr. 15, 1999 | |
98-0109
|
In re Devon G.
Victim's untimely request for restitution doesn't preclude the victim's restitution claim. |
Juveniles |
|
Apr. 15, 1999 | |
98-0141
|
Toni W. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
Arizona Department of Economic Services has no duty to offer reunification services to mother before petitioning for severance. |
Family Law |
|
Apr. 15, 1999 | |
98-0325
|
Gray v. The Honorable Irwin
A defendant's second conviction for drug possession doesn't subject him to a prison sentence under an Arizona statute. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 15, 1999 | |
B114300
|
Martinez v. Vintage Petroleum, Inc.
No liability for negligent oil company when superseding act of third party causes an explosion. |
Torts |
|
Apr. 14, 1999 | |
B113282
|
People v. Duz-Mor Diagnostic Laboratory
Paying commissions to marketing contractors violates Unfair Competition Act, but 'unbundled billing' does not. |
Antitrust |
|
Apr. 14, 1999 | |
97-55139
|
Nunez v. City of Los Angeles
Los Angeles police officers don't have constitutionally protected property or liberty interests in promotion. |
Government |
|
Apr. 14, 1999 | |
97-10312
|
U.S. v. Ordaz
Officers may stop four cars emerging from area where criminal activity is suspected to have occurred. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 14, 1999 | |
B104031
|
Winograd v. American Broadcasting Company
Trial court's interpretation of an agreement stands even when multiple inferences can be drawn. |
Contracts |
|
Apr. 14, 1999 | |
F028743
|
Florio v. Lau
Time limit for deficiency judgment following foreclosure sale doesn't apply to mixed collateral creditors. |
Business Law |
|
Apr. 14, 1999 | |
B118244
|
Hernandez v. Garcetti
Statute of limitation for negligent third party spoliation suit starts to run upon discovery of actual harm. |
Torts |
|
Apr. 14, 1999 |