For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Estate of Condon
Out-of-state attorney who prepared estate in Colorado is entitled to attorney fees for services rendered in California. 		Attorneys Apr. 7, 1999
Hodges v. Santa Clara County Superior Court (Ford Motor Company)
Order 		Apr. 7, 1999
U.S. v. Murphy
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 6, 1999
National Corrective Training Institute v. Nelson
Order 		Intellectual Property Apr. 6, 1999
Chermok v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
Order 		Torts Apr. 6, 1999
Furr v. Seagate Technology Inc.
Order 		Employment Law Apr. 6, 1999
U.S. v. Grayson
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 6, 1999
Snell v. Glickman
Order 		Administrative Agencies Apr. 6, 1999
Garcia v. Lemaster
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 6, 1999
Marrs v. Boles
Order 		Civil Rights Apr. 6, 1999
U.S. v. Wiseman
Explanation on how a defendant's conduct affects interstate commerce under federal statute isn't prosecutorial misconduct. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 6, 1999
Haik v. Town of Alta
Order 		Real Property Apr. 6, 1999
U.S. v. Madrugal-Aguilar
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 6, 1999
Kapitan v. Apfel
Order 		Administrative Agencies Apr. 6, 1999
Purdy v. United Airlines Inc.
Order 		Civil Rights Apr. 6, 1999
Scarbrough v. Apfel
Order 		Administrative Agencies Apr. 6, 1999
Karara v. United States of America
Order 		Education Apr. 6, 1999
State v. Superior Court of the State of Arizona
Court erred in suppressing breath test results based on agency's failure to require operator recertification on immaterially modified machine. 		Administrative Agencies Apr. 6, 1999
Bankruptcy of Wytch
Order retroactively annulling automatic stay validates postpetition foreclosure sale and unlawful detainer action. 		Bankruptcy Apr. 6, 1999
Ortiz v. Stewart
Procedural default, as defined by state rule, bars numerous claims in federal habeas corpus proceeding. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 6, 1999
Kirkingburg v. Albertson's Inc.
Employer can't require driver who has received federal vision waiver to meet basic federal vision standards. 		Employment Law Apr. 6, 1999
Bouyer v. State Bar
Order 		Apr. 6, 1999
Sanders v. American Broadcasting Companies Inc.
Order 		Apr. 6, 1999
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Loesl
Insurer isn't liable for accident caused by the insured's passenger while using his own vehicle. 		Insurance Apr. 5, 1999
Amancio v. Forster
Mere initial classification of offense as felony, doesn't mandate jury trial upon redesignation of offense as misdemeanor. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 5, 1999
State v. Cohen
Reliance by victim must be shown for fraudulent schemes and artifices conviction. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 5, 1999
Leckie v. County of Orange
Life estate transfer to non-family member is ownership transfer making property taxable at full value. 		Taxation Apr. 5, 1999
People v. Braz
No enhancement for hit and run causing permanent, serious injury unless injury caused by failure to stop and render aid. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 5, 1999
Fierro v. Gomez
Death row inmates who haven't chosen lethal gas as method of execution can't challenge its constitutionality. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 5, 1999
U.S. v. James
Order 		Apr. 5, 1999
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.