This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
U.S. v. 5M, Inc.
Order
Real Property Jan. 28, 1999
Dunbar v. Apfel
Order
Administrative Agencies Jan. 28, 1999
Electrical Distributors Inc. v. SFR Inc.
Purchase contract with corporation, containing covenant not to compete, is binding on shareholders.
Contracts Jan. 28, 1999
Four B Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
Employer's selective prohibition of union activity on employer's premises violates the National Labor Relations Act.
Labor Law Jan. 28, 1999
Perkins v. Kansas Department of Corrections
Requiring prisoner to wear face mask due to his HIV status constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.
Prisoners Rights Jan. 28, 1999
U.S. v. Peck
Order
Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 28, 1999
U.S. v. Smith
Order
Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 28, 1999
Morris v. Hargett
Order
Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 28, 1999
Dabney v. Rubin
Order
Taxation Jan. 28, 1999
Martin v. Young
Order
Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 28, 1999
U.S. v. Smith
Order
Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 28, 1999
Pickens v. Mike Naughton Ford Inc.
Order
Torts Jan. 28, 1999
Hernandez v. Lemaster
Order
Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 28, 1999
Inter-Tel Inc. v. Bank of America
Business loans transferred to bank's collection department without being in default is wrongful conduct.
Banking Jan. 27, 1999
Southern Disposal Inc. v. Texas Waste Management
Exclusive contract between city and private company for waste disposal services doesn't violate state constitution.
Antitrust Jan. 27, 1999
State of Oklahoma v. U.S.
Driver's Privacy Protection Act constitutes valid exercise of congressional power.
Constitutional Law Jan. 27, 1999
City of Stilwell, Oklahoma v. Ozarks Rural Electric Cooperative Corp.
Commissioners' Report properly assessed calculation of just compensation in a condemnation proceeding under Oklahoma law.
Constitutional Law Jan. 27, 1999
U.S. v. Davis
Order
Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 27, 1999
Dixon v. Martin
Order
Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 27, 1999
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh v. Greene
Opinion
Jan. 27, 1999
Fancher v. Jordan
Order
Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 27, 1999
Blue v. Widnall
Amended opinion
Civil Rights Jan. 27, 1999
U.S. v. Joey K.
Order
Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 27, 1999
Columbia Parcar Corp. v. Arizona Department of Transportation
Ruling remanding matter for new hearing on the merits doesn't entitle party to attorney fees.
Civil Procedure Jan. 26, 1999
Simms v. The State of Oklahoma
Amendment to Title VII charge doesn't relate back where it alleges new theory of recovery.
Civil Rights Jan. 26, 1999
Fullmer v. United States of America
Order
Torts Jan. 26, 1999
Miller v. Champion
Counsel's failure to inform defendant of element of charged crime before defendant pleaded guilty constitutes ineffective counsel.
Criminal Law and Procedure Jan. 22, 1999
Arizona's Towing Professionals Inc. v. State of Arizona
State agency improperly considers untimely bid protest that lacked good cause explanation for its untimeliness.
Administrative Agencies Jan. 22, 1999
Bahr v. State of Arizona
Property tax classification based on location within foreign trade zone doesn't violate Uniformity Clause.
Taxation Jan. 22, 1999
In the Matter of Forty-Seven Thousand Six Hundred Eleven Dollars and Thirty-One Cents (47,611.31) U.S. Currency
Claimant has five additional days to file claim when state mails notice of pending forfeiture.
Civil Procedure Jan. 22, 1999