For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Heard v. Louisiana
Order 		USSC Apr. 29, 2020
Estate of Esther Klieman v. Palestinian Authority
Order 		USSC Apr. 29, 2020
Sokolow v. PLO
Order 		USSC Apr. 29, 2020
Richards v. Louisiana
Order 		USSC Apr. 29, 2020
Victor v. Louisiana
Order 		USSC Apr. 29, 2020
Johnson v. Louisiana
Order 		USSC Apr. 29, 2020
People v. Bucio
Senate Bill 1437 is constitutional and does not conflict with Proposition 7; thus, defendant's petition for resentencing under SB 1437 should have been granted. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 2DCA/6 Apr. 29, 2020
In re David William Bartenwerfer and Kate Marie Bartenwerfer
Bankruptcy court correctly determined that all of appellee's state court attorneys' fees were nondischargeable pursuant to Bankruptcy Code Section 523(a)(2)(A). 		Bankruptcy BAP Apr. 29, 2020
Badgley v. U.S.
When a grantor derives substantial present economic benefit from property, she retains the enjoyment of that property for purposes of 26 U.S.C. Section 2036(a). 		Tax 9th Apr. 29, 2020
U.S. v. Ray
District court improperly excluded psychologist's testimony on ground that psychologist did not opine that defendant was unable to appreciate nature and quality of his acts. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 9th Apr. 29, 2020
People v. Landowski
Substantial evidence supported conclusion that defendant knowingly associated with criminal street gang with specific intent to assist in criminal conduct by gang members. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 3DCA Apr. 28, 2020
Georgia v. Public Resource.Org, Inc.
Annotations in Georgia's Official Code were not copyrightable because Code Revision Commission qualified as legislator and created them in discharge of its duties. 		Intellectual Property USSC Apr. 28, 2020
Maine Community Health Options v. United States
Congress did not repeal Government's obligation to pay insurers under Risk Corridors statute's formula. 		Health Care USSC Apr. 28, 2020
New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. City of New York
City's amendment to its rule regarding transport of firearms was the precise relief petitioners sought; thus, petitioners' claim was moot. 		Constitutional Law USSC Apr. 28, 2020
Moore v. Teed
Benefit-of-the-bargain damages are available to fully compensate a plaintiff for all detriment proximately caused by fraudulent fiduciary's actions. 		Remedies 1DCA/1 Apr. 28, 2020
In re G.C.
Substantial evidence supported juvenile court's order removing children from parents' custody. 		Dependency 4DCA/2 Apr. 28, 2020
Mikhaeilpoor v. BMW of North America, LLC
Trial court did not abuse its discretion in applying the lodestar method because its findings were supported by substantial evidence. 		Civil Procedure 2DCA/1 Apr. 28, 2020
In re Aubrey T.
Evidence was insufficient to support juvenile court's finding that father abandoned daughter within meaning of Family Code Section 7822. 		Dependency 2DCA/7 Apr. 28, 2020
Perez v. Barr
Suspension Clause does not require government compensation of court-appointed counsel as long as pro bono counsel is available. 		Immigration 9th Apr. 28, 2020
Ajaxo, Inc. v. E*Trade Financial Corp.
Trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff payment of reasonable royalty under California Uniform Trade Secret Act. 		Intellectual Property 6DCA Apr. 27, 2020
Pinter-Brown v. The Regents of the University of California
Trial court erred in allowing testimony of hearsay report and list of anonymous unadjudicated discrimination complaints to be used as propensity evidence. 		Employment Discrimination 2DCA/8 Apr. 27, 2020
El Rovia Mobile Home Park, LLC v. City of El Monte
Cities are entitled broad discretion in selecting the base year under rent control. 		statutory_interpretation 2DCA/5 Apr. 27, 2020
In re S.R.
Courts may determine whether caregivers have a sexual interest in children to draw reasonable inferences on risks of substantial harm. 		Dependency 2DCA/1 Apr. 27, 2020
LN Management v. JPMorgan Chase Bank
Dead person was not proper person to be sued because the dead lack capacities that litigants must have to allow for a true Article III case or controversy. 		Civil Procedure 9th Apr. 27, 2020
Luna v. Hansen & Adkins Auto Transport
Employer does not violate Fair Credit Reporting Act by providing FCRA disclosure simultaneously with other employment materials. 		Consumer Law 9th Apr. 27, 2020
In re John G. Moser
'Return to the fray' doctrine requires bankruptcy courts to advise creditors on the scope of discharge injunctions. 		Bankruptcy BAP Apr. 24, 2020
County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund
Clean Water Act requires permit from Environmental Protection Agency when there is direct discharge from point source into navigable waters or when there is 'functional equivalent of a direct discharge.' 		Environmental Law USSC Apr. 24, 2020
Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc.
Plaintiff in trademark infringement suit is not required to show that defendant willfully infringed plaintiff's trademark as precondition to profits award. 		Intellectual Property USSC Apr. 24, 2020
Barton v. Barr
For purposes of cancellation-of-removal eligibility, 8 U.S.C. Section 1182(a)(2) offense committed during initial seven years of residence does not need to be one of the offenses of removal. 		Immigration USSC Apr. 24, 2020
Wilk v. Neven
Eighth Amendment prohibits prison officials from disregarding known substantial risk of serious harm to inmates and failing to respond reasonably. 		Civil Rights 9th Apr. 24, 2020
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.