Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
B288889
|
Tesoro Refining v. L.A. Regional Water Quality Control Bd.
Substantial evidence supported trial court's denial of plaintiff's writ of mandate challenging Regional Water Quality Control Board's cleanup and abatement order. |
Water Rights |
|
A. Jones | Nov. 27, 2019 |
A155725
|
People v. Drayton
Substantial evidence supported verdict convicting defendant of assault by means of force likely to cause great bodily injury after defendant bear-hugged his ex-girlfriend and held her over train tracks as train approached. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
G. Burns | Nov. 27, 2019 |
C087417
|
City of Anaheim v. Bosler
Petitioners did not provide authority suggesting an extracontractual duty owed by the abolished Anaheim Redevelopment Agency to City of Anaheim employees for payment of retirement costs, so petitioners' claims failed. |
Government |
|
M. Butz | Nov. 27, 2019 |
B297338
|
Kanovsky v. At Your Door Self Storage
Trial court properly granted defendant's motion for summary judgment because plaintiffs contracted to accept risk, elected to be self-insured and then retroactively demanded to be paid for water damage. |
Insurance |
|
J. Wiley | Nov. 27, 2019 |
C085721
|
Marriage of Pasco
Trial court abused its discretion by basing its decision on appellant's request for an order solely on argument of counsel and respondent's unsworn statements in response to court's questions. |
Family Law |
|
A. Hoch | Nov. 27, 2019 |
A151789
|
O&C Creditors Group, LLC v. Stephens & Stephens XII, LLC
California's Anti-SLAPP statute protects the dispersal of settlement funds pursuant to active litigation; a lienhold challenger must demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits to overcome an Anti-SLAPP motion |
Anti-SLAPP |
|
T. Brown | Nov. 27, 2019 |
E067578
|
People v. Salcido
The Immigration Consultant Act was not preempted by Department of Homeland Security regulations 8 C.F.R. Sections 1.1, 1.2, and 292.1 (2018) as to defendant. |
Immigration |
|
M. Ramirez | Nov. 27, 2019 |
17-16360
|
Makekau v. State of Hawaii
A plaintiff who obtains a preliminary injunction under the All Writs Act is not a "prevailing party" for fee-shifting purposes when the injunction omits reference to the claim's merits. |
Civil Rights |
|
S. Graber | Nov. 27, 2019 |
18-15064
|
State of Montana Dept. of Revenue v. Blixseth
A creditor lacks standing to petition for involuntary bankruptcy if any debt amount is subject to an ongoing bona fide dispute, notwithstanding agreement on a portion of the disputed debt. |
Bankruptcy |
|
M. Hawkins | Nov. 27, 2019 |
17-35970
|
U.S. v. Gobert
Assault with a dangerous weapon described in 18 U.S.C. Section 113(a)(3) is a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. Section 924(c)(3)(A). |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
C. Bea | Nov. 27, 2019 |
B292602
|
Modification: Regency Midland Construction, Inc. v. Legendary Structures, Inc.
The court will look to a contract's purpose when interpreting a provision that is riddled with drafting errors. |
Contracts |
|
J. Wiley | Nov. 27, 2019 |
17-8830
|
Paul v. U.S.
Order |
|
Nov. 26, 2019 | ||
18-1451
|
National Review, Inc. v. Mann
Order |
|
Nov. 26, 2019 | ||
18-9517
|
Isom v. Arkansas
Order |
|
Nov. 26, 2019 | ||
19-151
|
U.S. v. Walton
Order |
|
Nov. 26, 2019 | ||
19-6016
|
Chance v. U.S.
Order |
|
Nov. 26, 2019 | ||
19-6033
|
Johnson v. U.S.
Order |
|
Nov. 26, 2019 | ||
19-122
|
Thompson v. Hebdon
Alaska's individual-to-candidate and individual-to-group contribution limit of $500 per year is unconstitutional under the factors set forth by the Court in 'Randall v. Sorrell'. |
Constitutional Law |
|
P. Curiam (USSC) | Nov. 26, 2019 |
S029551
|
People v. Johnson
A prosecutor's peremptory strike of three out of five black jurors coupled with launching a background check into another black juror is insufficient to sustain a Batson/Wheeler motion. |
Constitutional Law |
|
T. Cantil-Sakauye | Nov. 26, 2019 |
S238627
|
People v. Lopez
'In re Arturo D.' is overruled to the extent that it created an exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement for searches to locate a driver's identification following a traffic stop. |
Constitutional Law |
|
L. Kruger | Nov. 26, 2019 |
S082101
|
People v. Rhoades
Although defendant's constitutional right to confront his witness was violated, the violation did not affect the jury's verdict because other evidence more strongly tied the murder to defendant's truck. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
L. Kruger | Nov. 26, 2019 |
C088052
|
In re J.R.
Juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in terminating dependency jurisdiction because ample evidence showed, among other things, that minor's best interests were considered most important and discussed throughout proceedings. |
Dependency |
|
H. Hull | Nov. 26, 2019 |
B289046
|
Briganti v. Chow
Defamation claim should not be stricken because although defendant contended that his Facebook comment was hyperbole, plaintiff need only establish her claim had at least minimal merit under anti-SLAPP analysis. |
Anti-SLAPP |
|
B. Currey | Nov. 26, 2019 |
B265304
|
Chen v. Los Angeles Truck Centers, LLC
Because Indiana had a real interest in applying its law, and California's interest was only hypothetical, the trial court correctly applied Indiana products liability law. |
Civil Procedure |
|
E. Grimes | Nov. 26, 2019 |
A157877
|
In re Jones
The Legislature had a rational basis to narrow Penal Code Section 1170(d)(2)'s resentencing provision to juvenile LWOP defendants, while denying the same opportunity to 18 - 25 year old LWOP defendants. |
Juveniles |
|
A. Tucher | Nov. 26, 2019 |
17-72231
|
Manhani v. Barr
An Immigration Judge's finding that an applicant submitted a frivolous asylum claim bars the applicant from seeking further benefits and removability waivers available under the Immigration and Naturalization Act. |
Immigration |
|
R. Clifton | Nov. 26, 2019 |
13-71916
|
Fares v. Barr
Board of Immigration Appeals erroneously interpreted Immigration and Nationality Act Section 212(e), and since petitioner was admissible under various statutory provisions, he was 'otherwise admissible' for INA Section 237(a)(1)(H) waiver purposes. |
Immigration |
|
S. Graber | Nov. 26, 2019 |
H044628
|
Global Protein Products, Inc. v. Le
Appellants' claim that respondent's trade secret was invalid was insufficient to dissolve permanent injunction. |
Civil Procedure |
|
E. Premo | Nov. 25, 2019 |
H046541
|
R.E. v. Superior Court (Santa Clara)
Welfare and Institutions Code Section 208.5(a) should not be interpreted to deny juvenile courts the authority to order commitment for wards who violate probation after they turn 19. |
Juveniles |
|
E. Premo | Nov. 25, 2019 |
C085906
|
Natarajan v. Dignity Health
There is no constitutional right to hospital admitting privileges; private medical institution's revocation proceedings are governed by common law fair procedure rules, not procedural due process. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
M. Butz | Nov. 25, 2019 |