This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
Hart v. Hart
Under Family Code section 6345(a), family court had no discretion to renew a domestic violence restraining order for less than five years.
Family Law 2DCA/2 Oct. 29, 2025
Pacho Limited Partnership v. Eureka Energy Co.
Where the property lease's primary purpose was not agricultural, the trial court erred in applying Civil Code section 717's 51-year limit, particularly where enforcement would result in unjust forfeiture.
Real Property 2DCA/6 Oct. 29, 2025
People v. Sevilla
Trial court properly refused defendant's request for involuntary manslaughter instruction when evidence supported defendant's deliberate shooting was more than mere criminal negligence
Criminal Law and Procedure 1DCA/4 Oct. 29, 2025
NLRB v. North Mountain Foothills Apartments
Retrospective relief was not available to employer who could not demonstrate any harm suffered due to NLRB's allegedly unconstitutional for-cause removal protections.
Administrative Agencies 9th Oct. 29, 2025
Kahn v. Coinbase Inc.
Where Coinbase user's request for injunctive relief was not limited to existing account holders but rather sought to protect the general public, agreement to arbitrate was unenforceable.
Consumer Law, Arbitration 1DCA/3 Oct. 27, 2025
Boyd v. Hamm
Order
USSC Oct. 27, 2025
Gilbert v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
Bona fide intent to be a customer was not required for standing under Unruh Civil Rights Act where plaintiff personally encountered an ADA violation and experienced difficulty because of it.
Disability Discrimination 9th Oct. 27, 2025
County of Los Angeles v. Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Trial court did not err in granting judgment for Los Angeles County in fee dispute against the sheriff, because he did not have the authority to retain Quinn Emanuel as counsel.
Attorneys, Government 2DCA/8 Oct. 27, 2025
Leeds v. City of Los Angeles
Because core of plaintiffs' issues involved refund entitlement rather than trash service fees' legality, individual questions predominated and a class action was not the best means for dispute resolution.
Tax, Civil Procedure 2DCA/4 Oct. 28, 2025
U.S. v. Vandyke
District court erroneously dismissed illegal firearm possession indictment, where defendant's Second Amendment rights were not violated given protective orders analogous to historical disarmament.
Constitutional Law, Criminal Law and Procedure 9th Oct. 28, 2025
People v. Feise
Trial court did not err by imposing a five-year enhancement on DUI defendant for causing victim paralysis, as a jury could reasonably reach the paralysis enhancement without expert medical testimony.
Criminal Law and Procedure 3DCA Oct. 24, 2025
People v. Guzman
When an objection to a peremptory challenge under CCP section 231.7 is erroneously sustained, the "deemed prejudicial" standard, which requires reversal and a new trial, does not apply.
Criminal Law and Procedure 4DCA/3 Oct. 24, 2025
People v. Lara
Defendant entitled to youthful offender parole hearing was not serving the functional equivalent of life without parole and was ineligible for resentencing relief under Penal Code section 1170.
Criminal Law and Procedure 2DCA/6 Oct. 24, 2025
SuperTECH Inc. v. My Choice Software LLC
California-based corporation was subject to Northern Mariana Islands Commonwealth's jurisdiction because it conducted business in the Commonwealth, with its dispute arising from that activity.
Civil Procedure 9th Oct. 24, 2025
People v. Riddle
After defendant's planned residential treatment fell through, trial court acted within its discretion in terminating mental health diversion and refusing to compel public payment for private treatment.
Criminal Law and Procedure 3DCA Oct. 23, 2025
People v. Warner
Defendant who possessed the requisite mental state for direct aiding and abetting murder was ineligible for relief under Penal Code section 1172.6.
Criminal Law and Procedure 1DCA/2 Oct. 23, 2025
People v. Krueger
Petitioner was ineligible for resentencing relief under Penal Code section 1172.6 because she was not convicted under any theory of liability affected by the requisite amendments to murder statutes.
Criminal Law and Procedure 1DCA/2 Oct. 23, 2025
Walker v. State of Arizona
After parties jointly stipulated to dismiss all federal claims, federal district court lost jurisdiction to enter final judgment and was required to remand remaining state claim to state court.
Civil Procedure 9th Oct. 23, 2025
Newsom v. Trump
Order
9th Oct. 24, 2025
Crawford v. Mississippi
Order
USSC Oct. 22, 2025
Amended Opinion: National Labor Relations Board v. Macy's Inc.
A union was not clearly and fully informed of the conditions necessary to be reinstated and therefore the business's lockout was unlawful.
Labor Law 9th Oct. 22, 2025
U.S. v. Kroyter
Laches barred coram nobis petition alleging ineffective assistance of counsel for inadequate immigration advice where petitioner waited nine years to file and two key attorneys were deceased by then.
Criminal Law and Procedure 9th Oct. 22, 2025
State of Oregon v. Trump
Because President Trump's action to federalize the Oregon National Guard in response to Portland ICE facility unrest was within his statutory authority, State of Oregon's ultra vires claim failed.
Constitutional Law 9th Oct. 22, 2025
Kouvabina v. Veltman
Attorney representing herself in numerous appeals and writ petitions during the previous five years was found to be a vexatious litigant subject to prefiling requirements.
Civil Procedure 1DCA/3 Oct. 17, 2025
Murphy v. Pina
Hearsay testimony from a previous deposition could not be used to raise a triable issue of material fact at the summary judgment stage because it was inadmissible at trial.
Evidence, Civil Procedure 2DCA/3 Oct. 20, 2025
People v. Wagstaff
Order
CASC Oct. 20, 2025
Save our Access v. City of San Diego
City failed to comply with CEQA requirements by neglecting to adequately inform the public of potential environmental impacts of approving a second ballot measure to remove building height limit.
Environmental Law 4DCA/1 Oct. 21, 2025
Modification: People v. U.S. Fire Insurance Co.
Trial court was not required to forfeit bond when defendant failed to appear for trial readiness conference because defendants may be excused from such a hearing and his counsel appeared.
Criminal Law and Procedure 4DCA/1 Oct. 21, 2025
S.C. v Doe 1
Leave to amend complaint to correct date of alleged sexual assault should have been granted even though statute under which the complaint had been filed required a certificate of merit.
Civil Procedure 5DCA Oct. 21, 2025
Gurganus v. IGS Solutions LLC
Trial court properly denied employer's motion to compel arbitration, where multiple agreements simultaneously signed by employee had the net effect of destroying mutuality.
Arbitration 1DCA/3 Oct. 21, 2025