For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

REPLACEMENT COPY OF TUESDAY, AUGUST 19, 2025

Name Category Published
Nutraceutical Corp. v. Lambert
Non-jurisdictional nature of Rule 23(f) does not render it appropriate for equitable tolling; since other rules clearly speak to firm nature of rule's 14-day deadline, court lacks jurisdiction to toll it. 		Civil Procedure USSC Feb. 27, 2019
Klikno v. U.S.
Order 		USSC Feb. 27, 2019
Franklin v. U.S.
Order 		USSC Feb. 27, 2019
Van Sach v. U.S.
Order 		USSC Feb. 27, 2019
Shields v. U.S.
Order 		USSC Feb. 27, 2019
Baker v. Berryhill
Order 		USSC Feb. 27, 2019
Lipscomb v. U.S.
Order 		USSC Feb. 27, 2019
Browning v. U.S.
Order 		USSC Feb. 27, 2019
Rotkiske v. Klemm
Order 		USSC Feb. 27, 2019
Marquez v. City of Long Beach
Legislature may exercise authority over minimum wages, despite authority in charter cities to legislate as to municipal affairs, because minimum wage addresses state's interest in ensuring workers can afford necessities in life. 		Constitutional Law 2DCA/7 Feb. 27, 2019
People v. Huber
When a mix of on-reservation and off-reservation conduct is at issue, California law is not preempted if there are off-reservation effects that necessitate State intervention. 		Native American Affairs 1DCA/4 Feb. 27, 2019
Deere & Co. v. Allstate Insurance Co.
Higher-layer excess policies were triggered once the first-layer excess policy limits, which were subject to a self-insured retention paid by plaintiff, had been exhausted; thus, judgment was reversed. 		Insurance 1DCA/4 Feb. 27, 2019
Wadler v. Bio-Rad Laboratories
Provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act are not 'rules or regulations' of the SEC for purposes of Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. 		Labor Law 9th Feb. 27, 2019
Arrey v. Barr
Board of Immigration Appeals committed legal error in its application of the 'firm settlement rule' when it declined to consider evidence of petitioner's past persecution; thus, claim remanded. 		Immigration 9th Feb. 27, 2019
Miller v. Inslee
'Janus' does not render state-mandated exclusive bargaining arrangement a First Amendment free association violation. 		Constitutional Law 9th Feb. 27, 2019
J.B. v. U.S.
IRS Publication 1 is insufficient notice under I.R.C. Section 7602(c)(1) because it does not provide taxpayers 'reasonable notice in advance' before third-party contacts are made. 		Administrative Agencies 9th Feb. 27, 2019
Yovino v. Rizo
A federal court may not count the vote of a judge who dies before the decision is issued under 28 U. S. C. Section 46(c); thus, Ninth Circuit judgment vacated. 		Judges USSC Feb. 26, 2019
Correia v. NB Baker Electric, Inc.
'Iskanian,' not 'Epic,' binds California intermediate appellate courts on the issue of whether governmental disputes, including PAGA claims, are subject to the Federal Arbitration Act. 		Arbitration 4DCA/1 Feb. 26, 2019
Millview County Water Dist. v. State Water Resources Control
Under Water Code Section 1126(b), the Board's formal adoption of its order constituted 'final action' and triggered the running of the statute of limitations; thus, plaintiff's petition was time-barred. 		Water Rights 1DCA/1 Feb. 26, 2019
In re J.G.
Courts may consider supplemental income benefits when determining one's ability to pay restitution, but factors including future earning capacity, current financial situation, and total amount ordered should also be considered. 		statutory_interpretation CASC Feb. 26, 2019
In re L.D.
Challenge to sufficiency of Indian Child Welfare Act notice untimely when raised in appeal of post-jurisdictional order that does not 'subsume' the notice's sufficiency. 		Dependency 6DCA Feb. 26, 2019
People v. Beman
Punishment for substantive offenses in addition to punishment for conspiracy to commit those underlying offenses is not precluded when the conspiracy's objectives go beyond the underlying offenses. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 1DCA/2 Feb. 25, 2019
Darrin v. Miller
Under the Elder Abuse Act, 'other treatment' can constitute elder abuse if it results in 'physical harm or pain or mental suffering' even if there is no special relationship between the parties. 		statutory_interpretation 1DCA/2 Feb. 25, 2019
Richmond Compassionate Care v. 7 Stars Holistic
Private actions restraining trade are not protected activity, which must form the gravamen of a cause of action challenged by an anti-SLAPP motion to strike. 		Anti-SLAPP 1DCA/2 Feb. 25, 2019
Orchard Estate Homes v. Orchard Homeowners Alliance
Voter apathy not a required element to reduce the percentage of affirmative votes to adopt an amendment to the covenants, conditions, and restrictions of a planned development under Civil Code Section 4275. 		Real Property 4DCA/2 Feb. 25, 2019
Dai v. Barr
Order 		9th Feb. 25, 2019
United Farmers Agents Assoc. v. Farmers Group
Plaintiff not entitled to declaratory relief on its claim that defendants' agreements preclude termination based on failure to meet performance standards; defendants had a right to terminate without cause under the agreement. 		Contracts 2DCA/8 Feb. 25, 2019
In re Ramirez
Petitioner's felony-murder special circumstance must be vacated because he was not a major participant in the murder committed while he was an accomplice in the attempted commission of robbery. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 5DCA Feb. 22, 2019
Grafilo v. Cohanshohet
Order to produce medical records of five of defendant's patients in connection with an investigation into his prescription of controlled substances was reversed; state failed to demonstrate good cause to obtain records. 		Constitutional Law 2DCA/8 Feb. 22, 2019
People v. Jimenez
Evidence subject to a 'Brady v. Maryland' violation claim, even if suppressed, must be material and prejudicial to provide grounds for a new trial. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 4DCA/1 Feb. 22, 2019
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.