Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S224313
|
In re G.D.
Order |
|
Apr. 16, 2015 | ||
S224440
|
People v. Green
Order |
|
Apr. 16, 2015 | ||
14-1468
|
Heers v. Parsons (In re Heers)
Judgment debts are excepted from discharge due to Debtor’s defalcations while acting as fiduciary in underlying probate matters. |
Bankruptcy |
|
Apr. 16, 2015 | |
14A1065
|
Zubik v. Burwell
Order |
|
Apr. 16, 2015 | ||
09-99015
|
Medina v. Chappell
Order |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Apr. 16, 2015 | |
14-72343
|
In re County of Orange
Federal court sitting in diversity should have applied more protective state law instead of federal law to evaluate validity of pre-dispute jury trial waiver. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Apr. 16, 2015 | |
S224472
|
Dhillon v. John Muir Health
Order |
|
Apr. 16, 2015 | ||
G049764
|
People v. Galvan
Inmate is ineligible for resentencing relief because his crime constituted a ‘serious’ felony although it was not so classified at time of final judgment. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 16, 2015 | |
A139821
|
Environmental Law Found. v. Beech-Nut Nutrition
Averaging contaminant exposure across units permissible means of measurement in duty to warn under Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act case. |
Consumer Law |
|
Apr. 16, 2015 | |
D065751
|
Rideau v. Stewart Title of California
Indemnity clause specifying award of attorney fees is not reciprocal and is not triggered by buyer’s breach of contract claim against escrow company. |
Contracts |
|
Apr. 15, 2015 | |
13-16285
|
Melendres v. Arpaio
District court exceeds authority in imposing injunction provisions that do not address Sheriff Office’s constitutional violations related to racial profiling in Arizona. |
Civil Rights |
|
Apr. 15, 2015 | |
B251810
|
City of San Buenaventura v. United Water Conserv. Dist.
Fees charged to city by water district are not 'property-related' under XIII D of the California Constitution. |
Government |
|
Apr. 15, 2015 | |
B254636
|
Walnut Acres Neighborhood Assn. v. City of L.A.
Zoning administrator’s finding of unnecessary hardship under Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 14.3.1 is not supported by the evidence and court is correct in ordering city to rescind permit for eldercare facility. |
Municipal Law |
|
Apr. 15, 2015 | |
B257230
|
County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors v. Superior Court (ACLU of Southern California)
Legal billing invoices related to lawsuits against County of Los Angeles involving Sheriff’s Dept.’s alleged inmate abuse are exempt from disclosure under CPRA. |
Attorneys |
|
Apr. 14, 2015 | |
A136641
|
Conti v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York Inc.
Church has no duty to warn about member who was a child molester but does have duty to prevent molestation during church-sponsored activities. |
Torts |
|
Apr. 14, 2015 | |
G048814
|
People v. Sledge
Third striker denied resentencing relief under Three Strikes Reform Act because he poses danger to society due to his criminal, mental health, and substance abuse history. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 14, 2015 | |
14-1115
|
In re: Charles G. Mahakian
Section 523(a)(3)(A) precludes discharge of creditor’s claim and excusable neglect does not excuse debtor’s untimely filed proof of claim. |
Bankruptcy |
|
Apr. 14, 2015 | |
13-50381
|
U.S. v. Gonzalez Becerra
Sentencing Guideline commentary defining ‘victims’ of mail theft is compatible with the term ‘victims’ in U.S.S.G. §2B1.1. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Apr. 14, 2015 | |
B255408
|
Golden State Water Co. v. Casitas Municipal Water District
Casitas Municipal Water District may finance purchase of private water service utility by eminent domain through Mello-Roos financing. |
Real Property |
|
Apr. 14, 2015 | |
B256050
|
People v. Diaz
Motion to release confidential juror identifying information made after conviction, sentence and appeal is untimely and defendant’s appeal must be dismissed. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Apr. 14, 2015 | |
B248694
|
DisputeSuite.com, LLC, v. Scoreinc.com
Dismissal of case based on contractual forum-selection clause is not a ‘final resolution’ that renders defendants ‘prevailing party’ for purposes of contractual attorney fees award. |
Contracts |
|
Apr. 14, 2015 | |
B253491
|
Benetatos v. City of Los Angeles
Restaurant owner is liable for public nuisance because his poorly- and neglectfully-maintained restaurant is a hub for criminal activities. |
Municipal Law |
|
Apr. 14, 2015 | |
13-10664
|
U.S. v. Mendez-Sosa
Under federal law, enhancement proper when prior offense received criminal points and was a 'crime of violence.' |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 13, 2015 | |
E059524
|
Save Our Uniquely Rural Community Environment v. County of San Bernardino (Al-Nur Islamic Center)
Reduction of attorney fees is not abuse of discretion where court has legitimate reasons for finding award ‘outrageous.’ |
Environmental Law |
|
Apr. 13, 2015 | |
B256241
|
Crown Capital Securities L.P. v. Endurance American Specialty Insurance Co.
Insurer properly denies coverage to undisclosed claims under application provision that excluded coverage for claims arising from previously disclosed claim. |
Insurance |
|
Apr. 12, 2015 | |
A141319
|
Adoption of Emilio G.
Not abuse of discretion to terminate rights of violent, unsupportive biological father seeking to prevent child’s adoption when he fails to show he is the presumed father and termination is in child’s best interest |
Family Law |
|
Apr. 12, 2015 | |
H041463
|
In re A.R.
Where father has already removed himself from the home and is following visitation restrictions, ‘substantial danger’ does not exist and child should not have been ordered removed from Father’s physical custody. |
Family Law |
|
Apr. 12, 2015 | |
H040646
|
Paul v. Patton
Court must give trust beneficiaries another chance to assert malpractice claim against their father’s attorney for botching trust instrument. |
Probate and Trusts |
|
Apr. 12, 2015 | |
B255005
|
People v. Keith
Drug offender’s sentence for crack cocaine-related offenses is reduced in light of recent changes in the law affecting cocaine. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 12, 2015 | |
14-50113
|
U.S. v. Urrutia-Contreras
Defendant must be resentenced in light of sentencing court’s failure to seek government’s position with respect to revocation sentencing. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 12, 2015 |