This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Ingram v. Stephens
Order
Oct. 8, 2013
Sanchez v. United States
Order
Oct. 8, 2013
Fifth Third Bancorp v. Arlington Video Productions
Order
Oct. 8, 2013
O'Neil v. United States
Order
Oct. 8, 2013
Smith v. United States
Order
Oct. 8, 2013
Yee v. Cheung
Lawsuit’s winner may not later sue opposing party’s attorneys for malicious prosecution when suit involved a valid business dispute.
Torts Oct. 7, 2013
Voggenthaler v. Maryland Square Shopping Center LLC
Order
Oct. 7, 2013
Phoenix Trading Inc. v. Loops LLC
Flexible toothbrush designer cannot be sued for defamation based on letters to New York City officials and the press accusing competitor of counterfeiting.
Torts Oct. 7, 2013
Diaz v. First American Home Buyers Protection Corp.
Warranty plan provider may not escape homeowner’s lawsuit based on her rejection of its offer to resolve her claims.
Civil Procedure Oct. 7, 2013
U.S. v. Flores-Cordero
Order
Oct. 7, 2013
Armstrong v. Brown
California prison officials may not shirk responsibility to provide accommodations to disabled parolees, who are awaiting hearings in county jails.
Prisoners Rights Oct. 7, 2013
City of Bell v. Superior Court (Rizzo)
City of Bell does not have to defend Robert Rizzo in civil or criminal lawsuits against him after he stole from the city for nearly 17 years.
Government Oct. 7, 2013
Chapman v. Skype Inc.
Consumer may continue to litigate class action alleging Skype deceptively labels calling plans “Unlimited” although they have many restrictions.
Business Law Oct. 7, 2013
Schad v. Ryan
Murderer may not file second habeas petition to claim his attorney should have presented evidence of the effect of childhood abuse on his mental condition.
Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 7, 2013
People v. Jones (Bryan Maurice)
Order
Oct. 4, 2013
People v. Maciel (Luis)
Order
Oct. 4, 2013
People v. Mai (Hung Thanh)
Order
Oct. 4, 2013
Hudec v. S.C. (People)
Order
Oct. 4, 2013
People v. Nguyen
Order
Oct. 4, 2013
People v. Broyles
Order
Oct. 4, 2013
People v. Martinez
Order
Oct. 4, 2013
Gomez v. S.C. (People)
Order
Oct. 4, 2013
People v. Cross
Order
Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 4, 2013
Alakozai v. Citizens Equity First Credit Union (In re Alakozai)
Credit union may sell borrowers’ property and evict them because they filed multiple bankruptcy petitions to delay sale.
Bankruptcy Oct. 4, 2013
Kurwa v. Kislinger
Court of Appeal may not decide appeal in case where parties voluntarily dismissed their claims, intending to preserve claims for a later appeal.
Civil Procedure Oct. 4, 2013
People v. Juhasz
Trial judge must give drug user another chance to enroll in drug treatment program, even if he twice squandered treatment opportunities in the past.
Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 4, 2013
Meddock v. County of Yolo
County is not responsible for injuries caused by tree that fell on man in parking lot because lot's trees were on ‘unimproved public property.’
Torts Oct. 4, 2013
GetFugu Inc. v. Patton Boggs LLP
Attorneys cannot get rid of company’s lawsuit for defamation based on press release that listed company’s alleged misdeeds on Internet.
Torts Oct. 4, 2013
People v. Valenzuela
Carjacker may not bring up his inability to pay a $10 crime prevention fine for the first time on appeal.
Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 4, 2013
People v. Mai
Defendant’s conviction for murder of California Highway Patrol officer is upheld because excusal of three African American prospective jurors was not racially motivated.
Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 3, 2013