This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...



Special Reports


ADR Profile

The Activist

Kendall J. Newman
Judicate West

Firm Profile

Brothers in Law

Mendez & Sanchez

2025-12-11

MCLE

SEC at the door? Mind your ethics - and your client

Dec. 10, 2025

When the SEC comes knocking, corporate counsel must call ...

By Alanna G. Clair, Shari L. Klevens

Military bases' new names sound like the old Confederate ones

Dec. 4, 2025

Military bases previously renamed to remove Confederate a...

By Eileen C. Moore

From Sacramento to Shiraz: Practical steps for registering California divorce judgments abroad

Nov. 25, 2025

A California divorce decree is binding throughout the U.S...

By Abbas Hadjian


Today's News

Land Use, LA Fires, Civil Litigation


The petition seeks to invalidate Newsom's SB 9 suspension and similar bans adopted by Los Angeles, Pasadena, Malibu, and Los Angeles County, arguing the orde...


Land Use, LA Fires, Civil Litigation


The petition seeks to invalidate Newsom's SB 9 suspension and similar bans adopted by Los Angeles, Pasadena, Malibu, and Los Angeles County, arguing the orde...


Intellectual Property


VirtaMove Corp. alleges AWS' migration and container services use processes covered by two of its patents, claims Amazon denies. The tech giant also asserts ...


A San Francisco judge denied Nima Momeni's request to stay a wrongful death suit during pending matters around his conviction for murder, finding no real sel...


Dana Williamson and two other well-known political consultants have been charged with diverting $225,000 from a campaign account for former congressman and C...


Land Use, LA Fires, Civil Litigation


The petition seeks to invalidate Newsom's SB 9 suspension and similar bans adopted by Los Angeles, Pasadena, Malibu, and Los Angeles County, arguing the orde...


Columns

Treat your (human) colleagues as allies - and your LLMs as adversaries

Dec. 12, 2025
By Caroline Radell, Michael M. Rosen

As large language models like ChatGPT and Claude proliferate, attorneys must balance their promise for efficiency and insight ...


Arbitration discovery: A new paradigm

Dec. 12, 2025
By Victor E. Bianchini

California's SB 940 has transformed arbitration from a streamlined alternative to litigation into a process nearly as cumberso...


As AI-driven defamation suits emerge, courts must not only weigh who's accountable, but also whether anti-SLAPP laws -- and fr...



Verdicts & Settlements

Wage and Hour Angelica Velasquez, individ... $850,000
Auto v. Auto Austin Richard Moreno v. Jo... $675,000
Wage and Hour Deanna Rickets, an individu... $600,000
Wage and Hour Steven Milligan, individual... $480,000
Unfair Competition The People of the State of ... $350,000
Wage and Hour Michelle Mireles, individua... $250,000
Wage and Hour Lakeshia Cook-Farrar, as an... $230,000
Wage and Hour Lee Solomon, individually a... $225,000
Wage and Hour Santino Lopez, on behalf of... $163,537
Song-Beverly Act John McCormack v. FCA US LL... $89,518

On the Move

Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney P.C.

Dec. 5, 2025


Thomas Tuon joined Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney P.C. as an associate in Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney (San Francisco). The move was Dec. 2, 2025.

Tuon focuses on intellectual property transactions, data privacy counseling, and professional liability and taxation litigation. Combining experience in both transactional and controversy matters, Tuon helps clients navigate licensing, compliance, and corporate structuring issues that arise at the intersection of innovation and regulation. He assists individuals, startups, and established companies in protecting their intangible assets, managing risk, and ensuring compliance with evolving state and federal frameworks.


Details

Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney P.C. has 69 attorneys in 4 offices including San Francisco, Sacramento, Los Angeles. Among the law firm’s key practice areas are Litigation, Professional Liability, White Collar Defense & Investigations, Intellectual Property, Sports & Entertainment . The firm’s website is www.mpbf.com

Address

550 California Street, 14th Floor , San Francisco CA 94104 United States
T: (415) 788-1900

Featured Content


Community News

Community News, Alternative Dispute Resolution


The bar association dates to 1955, when Black attorneys in the Bay Area banded together to confront discrimination in the cour...



Podcasts

Davis Wright Tremaine's Vid Prabhakaran joins In the Counsel's Chair to break down three of the biggest challenges facing the ...


Daily Appellate Report

Criminal Law and Procedure

People v. Kinnear

Trial court erred by imposing upper term and second-strike sentence after accepting defendant's stipulation without advising him of his constitutional rights or eliciting a knowing and vo...


Prisoners' Rights

Human Rights Defense Center, Inc. v. Uttecht

Prison officials were required to show that policy restricting mail to prisoners--impinging their First Amendment rights--advanced penological interest of reducing inmate-on-inmate violence.


Antitrust

Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc.

District court did not abuse its discretion by finding Apple in contempt after it willfully violated an injunction prohibiting anticompetitive behavior that discouraged purchases from App...


Criminal Law and Procedure

People v. Harrison

Defendant's resentencing petition for mitigation due to military service-related conditions failed because his conviction was for a statutorily excluded super-strike offense rendering him...


Torts, Immunity

Modification: Gilliland v. City of Pleasanton

Trial court applied an incorrect legal standard in finding that vehicle collision occurred during a qualifying police "pursuit," which would immunize the city from liability.