This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Personal Injury & Torts

Jun. 4, 2002

Defender's Accuser Did Not Act With Malice, Panel Says

SAN FRANCISCO - Prominent criminal defense attorney Patrick Hallinan cannot prevail on a malicious prosecution suit against former client Ciro Mancuso because Mancuso didn't act with malice while lying to federal prosecutors about Hallinan's involvement in a drug conspiracy, a state appellate court has ruled.

By Peter Blumberg
Daily Journal Staff Writer
        SAN FRANCISCO - Prominent criminal defense attorney Patrick Hallinan cannot prevail on a malicious prosecution suit against former client Ciro Mancuso because Mancuso didn't act with malice while lying to federal prosecutors about Hallinan's involvement in a drug conspiracy, a state appellate court has...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up