This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Criminal

May 24, 2002

Difference Between Lies, Damned Lies Is Key to This Case

SAN FRANCISCO - Hearing a case involving prominent San Francisco criminal defense lawyer Patrick Hallinan, a panel of the 1st District Court of Appeal seemed inclined Wednesday to reject an argument that a lie is necessarily malicious.

By Matthew King
Daily Journal Staff Writer
        SAN FRANCISCO - Hearing a case involving prominent San Francisco criminal defense lawyer Patrick Hallinan, a panel of the 1st District Court of Appeal seemed inclined Wednesday to reject an argument that a lie is necessarily malicious.
        If the justices...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up