This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Zoning, Planning and Use

May 18, 2002

9th Circuit Case Demonstrates The Narrowness of 'Palazzolo'

Focus Column - By Daniel J. Curtin Jr., Cecily T. Talbert and David J. Petersen - The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal's recent decision in Daniel v. County of Santa Barbara , 2002 DJDAR 4304 (9th Cir. April 18, 2002), is one of the first federal appellate decisions applying the U.S. Supreme Court's decision last term in Palazzolo v. Rhode Island , 533 U.S. 606 (2001), which discussed when a takings claim is ripe for litigation.

        Focus Column
        
        By Daniel J. Curtin Jr., Cecily T. Talbert and David J. Petersen
        
        The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal's recent decision in Daniel v. County of Santa Barbara, 2002 DJDAR 4304 (9...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up