This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law

May 18, 2002

Court Deals Blow to Anti-Abortion Forces

SAN FRANCISCO - A closely and sharply divided federal appeals court ruled Thursday that anti-abortion militants' use of "wanted posters" to intimidate abortion doctors is not protected political speech but constitute threats under the court's first interpretation of the Freedom of Access to Clinics Entrances Act.

By Pamela A. MacLean
Daily Journal Staff Writer
        SAN FRANCISCO - A closely and sharply divided federal appeals court ruled Thursday that anti-abortion militants' use of "wanted posters" to intimidate abortion doctors is not protected political speech but constitute threats under the court's first interpretation of the Freedom of Access to Clinics ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up