This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Civil Rights

Aug. 28, 2001

Panel Looks Askance at Laws With Hiring Goals

SACRAMENTO - In a case that probes the limits of Proposition 209, the anti-affirmative action initiative, a trio of conservative justices appeared skeptical Friday of the validity of four state statutes that allegedly violate the ban on racial and gender preferences.

By Hudson Sangree
Daily Journal Staff Writer
        SACRAMENTO - In a case that probes the limits of Proposition 209, the anti-affirmative action initiative, a trio of conservative justices appeared skeptical Friday of the validity of four state statutes that allegedly violate the ban on racial and gender preferences.
        In particular, th...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up