This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Letter to the Editor

Jul. 29, 2016

Letter to the editor: Reliance on court attorneys has consequences

Steven Kimball's insightful article explains how excellent briefs can still lose to deficient briefs when judges rely upon "independent legal research" conducted by, and memos from, a court's staff attorneys. By John K. Haggerty

In his insightful article ("Superior brief writing doesn't always win the day," July 20) Steven Kimball explains how excellent briefs can still lose to deficient briefs when judges rely upon "independent legal research" conducted by, and memos from, a court's staff attorneys. It is easy to understand why in recent decades judges have increasingly relied upon these court attorneys to produce their decisions (i.e., expanding caseloads and the gr...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up