Litigation
Jul. 29, 2016
4th District's neutrality regarding JAMS questioned
Two lawsuits are challenging the neutrality of the 4th District Court of Appeal to hear cases involving the Orange County-based ADR provider because of its popularity as a lucrative post-bench option for justices.
Daily Journal Staff Writer
Two lawsuits are challenging the neutrality of the 4th District Court of Appeal to hear cases involving the Orange County-based ADR provider because of its popularity as a lucrative post-bench option for justices.
At the heart of the argument is what lawyers in both cases allege is unavoidable bias by the 4th District in favor of JAMS, stemming from its employment of three of the four livi...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In