This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law

Jun. 13, 2012

Court of Appeal rules 95-year-old defamation statute unconstitutional

An archaic statute regulating speech regarding banks was rule unconstitutional by the 1st District. By Mark Goldowitz and Ryan Metheny of the California Anti-SLAPP Project


By Mark Goldowitz and Ryan Metheny


Anyone who has participated in an Internet message board discussion knows that posters on such boards, especially anonymous ones, often play fast and loose with the facts, espouse strident opinions, and even resort to name-calling and vituperation. Much of this is the type of speech that, prior to the Internet, was confined to settings where it was unlikely to be heard or read by many people (physical poster boards, drunken bar ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up