This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit

Aug. 12, 2014

Court to weigh conflicting asylum standards

Conflict arose in 9th Circuit case law defining Convention Against Torture standards. It concerned which side - the alien seeking protection or a government lawyer - must prove that internal relocation is or isn't an option.


By John Roemer


Daily Journal Staff Writer


As the turbulent immigration debate evolves and Central American migrants stress U.S. systems, a federal appeals court is seeking to clarify a key rule for granting refuge to those who allege they have been tortured or oppressed abroad.

Those seeking protection under the United Nations Convention Against Torture, ratified by the U.S. 20 years ago, have much in common with those seeking asylum or other form...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up