This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Aug. 9, 2014

Mind the murky edges of the unauthorized practice of law

Only in the last century have bar associations and state courts sought to monitor whether nonlawyers were engaging in the practice of law outside a courtroom setting. By Kimberley Reeder


By Kimberley Reeder


The earliest rules regulating the unauthorized practice of law tended to focus on who would be permitted to appear in courts. These rules originated in the need of courts to regulate the conduct of individuals practicing before them. In was only in the last century that bar associations and state courts sought to monitor whether nonlawyers were engaging in the practice of law outside a courtroom setting. See Derek A. Denckla, "Nonlawyers ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up