This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Aug. 5, 2014

Smartphone case leaves questions

Two aspects of the decision - the scope of an allowable search warrant and cloud storage - are bound to give life to Riley for years to come. By Daniel Brenner


By Daniel Brenner


The U.S. Supreme Court's 9-0 decision in Riley v. California, 2014 DJDAR 8220 (June 25, 2014), made headlines for two reasons. First of all, Chief Justice John Roberts authored a near unanimous decision in an important Fourth Amendment case from an often bitterly divided court (only Justice Samuel Alito concurred separately). And it displayed the court's awareness about the technology and social impact of smartphones.

...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up