This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Government

Jul. 24, 2014

Data breach ruling reassures health care providers

California appeals courts have proven to be skeptical while interpreting the state's Confidentiality of Medical Information Act, particularly when examining lawsuits involving stolen medical data that crooks fail to actually access.


By Joshua Sebold


Daily Journal Staff Writer


California appeals courts have proven so far to be skeptical about health care providers' liability when personal medical information is lost, particularly when crooks fail to actually access the data because it's password-protected or encrypted.


The 3rd District Court of Appeal decided against a group of patients Monday who claimed Sutter Medical Foundation failed to protect their data when ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up