This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Labor/Employment,
California Supreme Court

Mar. 9, 2017

Rest period compliance guidance

Last year, the California Supreme Court held that an employer's discretion to provide employees with on-duty meal periods does not apply to rest periods. The case expands on the high court's landmark Brinker decision.

David Martinez

Partner and Executive Board Member
Robins Kaplan LLP

Intellectual Property and Business Litigation

2049 Century Park E Ste 3400
Los Angeles , CA 90067

Phone: (310) 552-0130

Fax: (310) 229-5800

Email: dmartinez@robinskaplan.com

Southwestern Univ Law School

David Martinez is a partner at Robins Kaplan LLP where he handles intellectual property, business, antitrust, and class action litigation across a broad range of industries, and co-chairs the firm's Retail Industry Group. He can be reached at dmartinez@robinskaplan.com

See more...

Christina Lincoln

associate
Robins Kaplan LLP

business litigation and catastrophic loss

2049 Century Park E Ste 3400
Los Angeles , CA 90067-3208

Phone: (310) 552-0130

Email: clincoln@robinskaplan.com

UC Berkeley Boalt Hall

Christina Lincoln is an associate at Robins Kaplan LLP where she handles business litigation and catastrophic loss insurance matters. She can be reached at clincoln@robinskaplan.com

See more...

Last year, the California Supreme Court held that an employer's discretion to provide employees with on-duty meal periods does not apply to rest periods. Augustus v. ABM Sec. Servs. Inc., 2 Cal. 5th 257 (2016). The Supreme Court had previously outlined an employer's obligation to provide meal periods in Brinker Rest. Corp. v. Superior Court, 53 Cal. 4th 1004, 1017 (2012). Augustus clarifies Brinker by holding that employees cannot be required to be "on c...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up